Flaming Flaming Burst +2d6 fire?

[orion90000]

any problems?

how about flaming flaming?

 

[Michael Silverbane]

I allow both in campaigns that I run. It has not caused me any grief.

 

[Sekhmet]

For the same price you could get Flaming/Frost or Shock or what have you. Who cares if you stack fire a second time?

 

[kitcik]

Both myself and my sword, Burning Cinder Fury of Crimson Chaos Fire, agree.

 

[RUMBLETiGER]

No problems, but I second the suggestion to go for variety instead.

 

[xigbar]

Sure, why not? Paying 27,000gp~ for a sword that does an extra 2d6 damage that most creatures will resist/be immune to by the time you can afford it is a bit underwhelming. It's an interesting idea for creatures that are weak to whatever you enchant the sword with, but that's what they made the bane property for.

 

[HoboGod]

You know, I asked this same question a while back. There really isn't anything in RAW to directly oppose it, but it can open a can of worms with certain special abilities such as Spell Storing, Merciful, and Valorous.

 

[Light Knight]

I thought I read in another thread, that elemental effects like these can be combined, but they had to be individually activated, hence turning the previous one off.