Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Connorsrpg" data-source="post: 6810714" data-attributes="member: 19265">[MENTION=6748898]ad_hoc[/MENTION]Thanks for your input. Re balance, I can see your point, but again, there is no point in going too far either. If the flaws are too negative, then no one will take them. You seem to think gaining a feat from the get-go is too powerful. As seen in other threads, some people even start all PCs with a feat at 1st level. Everyone on our site has so far thought that the flaws are appropriate. RARELY has a major flaw even been taken.You have provided one example, and one I addressed. (And I still feel that there is no need to go to ALL attacks for a major. Restricting your build to avoid said spells etc, is still a restriction, which adds weight to the flaw).Again, of course, with any flaw system, some power gamers might look to exploit it, but try to look to this with an eye to roleplaying too. It is extremely hard to cater to every character combo, but we feel we have a fair mix with fair balance. So, I am interested in what you think re the eg in my last post.Do others see a 'balance issue'? B/c quite frankly we have not, though still interested in the Ability penalty ones.</blockquote>