the followers that can be acquired through feats and class features such as animal companion (including a paladin's mount), cohort (including squire and torchbearer), and eidolon all seem to become less powerful in relation to their masters as their master advances in levels. familiars are an exception, presumably because they function more as companions than guardians. also, these followers often have unusual methods for advancement (like the mathematical formula used for cohorts).
why are followers handled this way? wouldn't it be simpler just to have a general rule, such as "all followers gain no experience points and remain four levels below their masters," or something?
why are followers handled this way? wouldn't it be simpler just to have a general rule, such as "all followers gain no experience points and remain four levels below their masters," or something?
