http://www.eagames.com/official/battlefield/battlefield2/us/editorial.jsp?src=communityupdate_063005
At least they are working on a patch.
At least they are working on a patch.
Planet Battlefield is busy but full of 14 year olds (or at least it sounds like it), and the forums are molasses-slow. I've gotten some good info at the EA UK forums, which are fairly busy, but about 80% of the posts are bitching about the game.Hatchling Dragon said:Anyone know a decent forum for BF2? I've tried Googling, but my Web Skills aren't even good enough to be called pathetic. Every one I've seen shows only the barest signs of life, and nothing I've seen on any of them has been of much use.
The UK forums are better; I remember the EA US BF2 site and it was pretty miserable.KenM said:Are the EA UK fourms better then the EA US fourms? The EA US BF2 site does not have they're fourms up yet. But the BF42 and BFV EA fourms were the worst messageboards I have seen, ever. First of all, it was not moderatied, so there was flame wars with some colorful words. Also, they were slow as heck. Sometimes a page would take 5 minutes to load, with my broadband connection. They are also a just a text fourm, not like here where people have alot of diffeernt sigs/ avatars to load.
I would think that EA, a computer software company would want to have they're very own message boards run good.
For chrissake... gah, EA's going to have to do something damned special to recapture my faith in them as a publisher. Free expansion pack might do it. Don't get me wrong, BF2 has great potential and I'm having fun when I can get it to work, but... damn. Not QAing a critical memory leak that affects EVERY server? Crap, all they would have had to do is run a beta server for a freaking day, and they'd have seen it.KenM said:http://www.eagames.com/official/battlefield/battlefield2/us/editorial.jsp?src=communityupdate_070805
They want people to unistall the game and not install the patch. They are working on a fix.