Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Forked Thread: Why the World Exists [GM-less Gaming]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Chaotic Archon" data-source="post: 4715883" data-attributes="member: 21828"><p>I 100% agree with you that some some people like immersive, dramaturgical roleplaying. I didn't mean to imply that people don't. I don't mean to say that playing a character within a story or telling a story has any 'edge' on being more or less ego driven. I'm talking about the less balanced player who's social confines prevent them from enjoying positive attention during a game. This is about a small subset of players that always seem to find their way into games. I'm talking from a purely personal perspective here, you might have never encountered 'this' player. Unfortunately, my friends and I have had more than our fair share of them, so they are a consideration.</p><p></p><p>I was unintentionally vague with that quoted comment, sorry. Let me rephrase it:</p><p>Some players have a very strong ego when they play. They want attention and channel that want through their character's deeds. I'm fairly certain that most of us have played with this type of person or at least heard horror stories of this person. What I meant about it being funny (perhaps ironic was a better choice of words?) is that if the person took a step back from the game, they'd possibly see that they're getting more positive attention by being part of the process instead of trying to garner it through mechanically 'beating' the process.</p><p></p><p>I disagree with you that they are in the same position that they were in with a GM because 'that' player is no longer collaborating, competing, disrupting, or being passive to a story teller that determines the outcome of that behavior. They are doing those things to themselves as well. Since they're actions include themselves, I'd like to think they'd be less inclined to disrupt their own play. I'm not saying this is 100% applicable to every player, but I believe that it's reasonable to assume the player isn't going to create a scene for the party, and then go out of his/her way to disrupt the events as that player unfolds them. As for competing, since resources are player generated, trying to get every coin, magic item, or treasure doesn't do much because the players can simply deprecate those things. I think you're dead on that a passive player will continue to experience things almost identically with our without a gm (in effect, that person is just allowing the party to be his/her gm....so they probably don't really apply to much of this conversation aside from being table candy <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> )</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Chaotic Archon, post: 4715883, member: 21828"] I 100% agree with you that some some people like immersive, dramaturgical roleplaying. I didn't mean to imply that people don't. I don't mean to say that playing a character within a story or telling a story has any 'edge' on being more or less ego driven. I'm talking about the less balanced player who's social confines prevent them from enjoying positive attention during a game. This is about a small subset of players that always seem to find their way into games. I'm talking from a purely personal perspective here, you might have never encountered 'this' player. Unfortunately, my friends and I have had more than our fair share of them, so they are a consideration. I was unintentionally vague with that quoted comment, sorry. Let me rephrase it: Some players have a very strong ego when they play. They want attention and channel that want through their character's deeds. I'm fairly certain that most of us have played with this type of person or at least heard horror stories of this person. What I meant about it being funny (perhaps ironic was a better choice of words?) is that if the person took a step back from the game, they'd possibly see that they're getting more positive attention by being part of the process instead of trying to garner it through mechanically 'beating' the process. I disagree with you that they are in the same position that they were in with a GM because 'that' player is no longer collaborating, competing, disrupting, or being passive to a story teller that determines the outcome of that behavior. They are doing those things to themselves as well. Since they're actions include themselves, I'd like to think they'd be less inclined to disrupt their own play. I'm not saying this is 100% applicable to every player, but I believe that it's reasonable to assume the player isn't going to create a scene for the party, and then go out of his/her way to disrupt the events as that player unfolds them. As for competing, since resources are player generated, trying to get every coin, magic item, or treasure doesn't do much because the players can simply deprecate those things. I think you're dead on that a passive player will continue to experience things almost identically with our without a gm (in effect, that person is just allowing the party to be his/her gm....so they probably don't really apply to much of this conversation aside from being table candy :) ) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Forked Thread: Why the World Exists [GM-less Gaming]
Top