Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="teitan" data-source="post: 8618936" data-attributes="member: 3457">Wrong. Spelljammer was never a good seller before and they were able to build hype for it. It was a big flop and didn't last two years. Greyhawk arguably has a much larger and more loyal and passionate fan base to build off of and in fact they successfully were able to revive it in 1998 until the end of 3.x with the end of Living Greyhawk. Spelljammer was released by TSR in 1989 and the last product came out in 1991. It was only ever an Easter egg after that and has become more of a rose colored glasses thing where people can now see the potential but the original, while having some fans, wasn't very well done with how the rules were implemented and some of the concepts came across very poorly. 5e era fans looking back on the artwork and the idea have given it new life through rose colored glasses but they're making changes to it to make it work as a setting because it was so bad wrong fun in rules implementation. I am looking forward to seeing it, not the price tag, but Perkins has done no wrong in my eyes so I expect a well done product that makes Spelljammer fun, interesting and wonderful. But acting like Spelljammer has a bigger fanbase than Greyhawk? It has been dead for 30 years. Greyhawk has been living the entire time. Yeah that was a pun.</blockquote>