JohnNephew
First Post
ConcreteBuddha said:
Non-leisure items, on the other hand, can have a decidedly higher sticker shock because the consumer needs the item.
Now I understand why I spend most of my budget on necessary items like food, while leisure items like movies are almost free! ;-)
I'm willing to agree that textbooks aren't a good example, because of the captive audience factor. On the other hand, I think that a lot of technical and scholarly texts ARE a good example. If you're a medievalist, you don't have to own every book in the field -- but the ones you choose to buy can easily set you back $60 for a 300-page hardcover. (Just got a catalog in the mail today from the Penn State Univ. Press, and I was leafing through it.)
Hobbies are, in general, pretty expensive. My dad is really into RC planes (gliders, in particular). He says the "must-have" model airplane, that wins all the competitions and stuff, costs $1400. And they have something like an 18-month waiting list. Doesn't that make gaming look cheap?
The thing is, you can get into flying model planes for relatively cheap -- but there's a whole range of price, quality and feature options running up to the $1000+ level. And you can bet the hardcore types who shell out for the high-end have a lot of everything else too. (My dad said one guy on a mailing list mentioned owning THREE of those expensive planes.) Gaming has lots of starter kits, but not as many super-mega-amazing things that only the most devoted will buy and everyone else will envy.