Quasqueton
First Post
I don't know if any of you will find this comparison as interesting as I did, but below is a picture of a Gargantuan creature on a standard battlemat.
I bought the Treebeard action figure at a toy store, and just out of curiousity, compared and measured it to my standard D&D figures and grid map. He stands 45' high, and fits all the measurements of a Gargantuan creature (20' face, 20' reach).
On the right is a Large-sized ogre. On the left is a Medium-size human, and then a Small-sized gnome. I am more impressed with the size catagories. A Colossal-sized creature is about twice as big as Gargantuan. Imagine a true representation of a great wyrm on a battlemap!
For my game session this past Friday, I advanced a treant to 20HD (Gargantuan), and used this mini (I call it a "maxi") to represent the creature on the game map.
I found it interesting to compare the game mechanic numbers to how the mini looks:
Anyway, I thought it an interesting exercise in comparison.
I'd love to find other such "maxi's" to use in D&D games. I kind of wish that WotC would produce some figures to represent Huge and larger creatures from the MM. Even the largest fantasy game minis I've ever found are just barely into the Huge catagorie.
In a previous game session, we used a Warhammer 40,000 Rhino (armored troop transport) to represent a bulette.
Quasqueton

I bought the Treebeard action figure at a toy store, and just out of curiousity, compared and measured it to my standard D&D figures and grid map. He stands 45' high, and fits all the measurements of a Gargantuan creature (20' face, 20' reach).

On the right is a Large-sized ogre. On the left is a Medium-size human, and then a Small-sized gnome. I am more impressed with the size catagories. A Colossal-sized creature is about twice as big as Gargantuan. Imagine a true representation of a great wyrm on a battlemap!
For my game session this past Friday, I advanced a treant to 20HD (Gargantuan), and used this mini (I call it a "maxi") to represent the creature on the game map.
I found it interesting to compare the game mechanic numbers to how the mini looks:
OLD BARK -- ELDER TREANT
Gargantuan Plant
Hit Dice: 20d8+140 (230 hp)
Initiative: –1
Speed: 40 ft. (6 squares)
Armor Class: 22 (–4 size, –1 Dex, +17 natural), touch 5, flat-footed 22
Base Attack/Grapple: +15/+44
Attack: Slam +24 melee (3d6+13)
Full Attack: 2 slams +24 melee (3d6+13)
Space/Reach: 20 ft./20 ft.
Special Attacks: Animate trees, double damage against objects, trample 3d6+19
Special Qualities: Damage reduction 10/slashing, low-light vision, plant traits, vulnerability to fire
Saves: Fort +26, Ref +5, Will +11
Abilities: Str 37, Dex 8, Con 25, Int 14, Wis 16, Cha 14
Skills: Diplomacy +20, Hide +4 (+20*), Intimidate +7, Knowledge (nature) +20, Listen +10, Sense Motive +12, Spot +10, Survival +10 (+12 aboveground)
Feats: Improved Sunder, Iron Will, Power Attack, Alertness, Improved Grapple, Snatch, Negotiator
Challenge Rating: 12
Alignment: neutral good
Anyway, I thought it an interesting exercise in comparison.
I'd love to find other such "maxi's" to use in D&D games. I kind of wish that WotC would produce some figures to represent Huge and larger creatures from the MM. Even the largest fantasy game minis I've ever found are just barely into the Huge catagorie.
In a previous game session, we used a Warhammer 40,000 Rhino (armored troop transport) to represent a bulette.
Quasqueton