Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
GenCon 2023 - D&D Rules Revision panel
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Stalker0" data-source="post: 9098667" data-attributes="member: 5889"><p>And that's the problem right there. We all look at our small pools of players and our own thoughts. And if we feel like 3.5 did it better in some ways, we then start to go "well clearly 5e is just not up to par", that is simply an uninformed "feeling" not backed with any statistical rigor.</p><p></p><p>We don't have access to the large amount of data WOTC has. I mean if WOTC thought based on their polling and surveys and market research that adding in more 3.5e mechanics would make the game better they would probably be playtesting that right now..... its a win win for them, if those changes were more popular AND made more changes, that gives double incentive for people to buy the new wave of books.</p><p></p><p>So what is more likely:</p><p></p><p>That WOTC did all this market research which told them nothing, threw out the old editions, made 5e, and got "crazy lucky" with the timing of things.</p><p></p><p>OR</p><p></p><p>WOTC did that market research, used it to create a game thats resonated with a larger playerbase, and got fortunate with the timing and other factors to create the modern phenomena that we see now</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Stalker0, post: 9098667, member: 5889"] And that's the problem right there. We all look at our small pools of players and our own thoughts. And if we feel like 3.5 did it better in some ways, we then start to go "well clearly 5e is just not up to par", that is simply an uninformed "feeling" not backed with any statistical rigor. We don't have access to the large amount of data WOTC has. I mean if WOTC thought based on their polling and surveys and market research that adding in more 3.5e mechanics would make the game better they would probably be playtesting that right now..... its a win win for them, if those changes were more popular AND made more changes, that gives double incentive for people to buy the new wave of books. So what is more likely: That WOTC did all this market research which told them nothing, threw out the old editions, made 5e, and got "crazy lucky" with the timing of things. OR WOTC did that market research, used it to create a game thats resonated with a larger playerbase, and got fortunate with the timing and other factors to create the modern phenomena that we see now [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
GenCon 2023 - D&D Rules Revision panel
Top