Gimble's a fraud!

We all know that the core rulebooks use the iconic characters whenever they're referring to characters, right?

So I'm perusing the 3.5 PHB, and on page 60 I come across a reference to Bergwin, a gnome rogue-bard with a little multiclassing XP problem. Bergwin? Who's Bergwin?

I check my 3.0 PHB -- sure enough, Bergwin's in there, too. Then it hits me. He's been there all along! He simply put a few ranks of Bluff to work, told WOTC his name was really Gimble, and usurped Devis as the iconic bard.

I've caught you, Bergwin, you fraud!
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad










Remove ads

Top