Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="IceBear" data-source="post: 119039" data-attributes="member: 1118">Oni, I don't think the argument is with stasis means, but with what stasis applies to.&nbsp; Basically, are the spells on an object placed in stasis considered to be that object?I personally do not think that spells cast on a person or object are necessarily considered to be part of that object or person (there may be exceptions, but I think that is what was intended in general).&nbsp; Thus, a burning torch put into stasis is cannot be damaged by the fire, and thus it will continue to burn once pulled out of the gloves.&nbsp; The spell effects, in my mind, would continue to run.It really depends on your opinon, I think, on how you would rule.&nbsp; Since they never state anything about spell durations, and it seems to be overpowered if you allow it to include spell durations, I'm not going to allow it to affect spell durations.IceBear</blockquote>

[QUOTE="IceBear, post: 119039, member: 1118"] Oni, I don't think the argument is with stasis means, but with what stasis applies to. Basically, are the spells on an object placed in stasis considered to be that object? I personally do not think that spells cast on a person or object are necessarily considered to be part of that object or person (there may be exceptions, but I think that is what was intended in general). Thus, a burning torch put into stasis is cannot be damaged by the fire, and thus it will continue to burn once pulled out of the gloves. The spell effects, in my mind, would continue to run. It really depends on your opinon, I think, on how you would rule. Since they never state anything about spell durations, and it seems to be overpowered if you allow it to include spell durations, I'm not going to allow it to affect spell durations. IceBear [/QUOTE]

Verification