"Good" Wikipedia articles

[Nifft]

What ever happened to that guy who was running around marking all D&D stuff "Not Notable"? Did he go away on his own?

Thanks, -- N

 

[love.christine]

Tale of the Comet

This. Fantastic Boxed Set/Module. Ran it a couple of years ago under 3E. I'm considering updating it to Pathfinder.

 

[BOZ]

How about articles on Waterdeep (article needs to be imporoved), Barovia, Sharn (article needs to be imporoved), Undermountain (article needs to be imporoved) & possibly Tale of the Comet?

yep, those all do need to be improved, but they need more work than what i was thinking of doing for this little project.

What ever happened to that guy who was running around marking all D&D stuff "Not Notable"? Did he go away on his own?

Thanks, -- N

no. however, although it took forever, we finally got people to take us seriously: Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Gavin.collins 2 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[love.christine]

yep, those all do need to be improved, but they need more work than what i was thinking of doing for this little project.

Then what exactly are you asking for?

 

[BOZ]

stuff that's much closer to the "Good Article" ideal; for example, the Drizzt article has just gotten a GA-review started; see new thread I just posted.