Alzrius
The EN World kitten
Well, you just mentioned it in direct response to my assertion that they were likely discontinuing the DCC line to comply with the terms of the GSL or a similar license that prohibits the distribution of a given game line under the GSL and the OGL simultaneously. You specifically said that this scenario is unlikely because Goodman wasn't discontinuing their other d20 products.
The first part of my reply was directed towards that - namely, that what we know about the 4E products from Goodman doesn't seem to support that idea. The second sentence was in reference to jaerdaph's idea - though I can see I should have made that clearer.
My point was that the failure to discontinue other d20 products does not make it any less likely that another, completely unrelated product line, is subject to an agreement that forbids its continued publication under the OGL. If anything, it makes that scenario more likely (or, at least, it makes it more likely that the DCC line is affected by some condition that does not afflict Goodman's other d20 product lines).
And if we weren't seeing actions that seemed to fly in the face of the GSL, I'd agree with you. But the early release date, the lack of "Dungeons & Dragons" on the covers, or listed as the rules set, seems to indicate that this isn't the case. If that's true, and they aren't using the GSL, then there's a different reason for discontinuing the OGL DCC products. I just don't think that it's related to the cost of removing the d20 logo, either.
Hmm. . . you may be right.
Whoops, I meant "GSL" where I said "OGL" there. Fixed in the original post.
I don't believe that I was. I think you're reading italics as anger, when it's merely emphasis.
You don't have to be angry to be snippy.
