El Jefe said:As per Knight Otu, YES provided that it sleeps at DM's choice.
I think it is already official assuming KO2's was a vote.Patlin said:That was a part of the original proposal, so I have no problem with that. Can we get one more yes vote to make it official? (Assuming KO's statement was intended to be a vote.)
Rystil Arden said:I think it is already official assuming KO2's was a vote.
Is this in effect if Goruskblain isn't wielded or is it in effect if Goruskblain is not the weapon being swung?Owner recieves a -5 luck penalty on melee weapon attack rolls when Goruksblain is not in use. For the purpose of this penalty, neither unarmed attacks nor spells count as weapons.
Cool. Although with that need to feed the hammer with 5 spell levels, the party's going to need a wand. Then again we have Planus.Patlin said:There is no penalty for using two weapon fighting as long as Goruksblain is one of them.
Hey, that's his goddess's favored weapon you're talking about. Even though he's never actually swung his shield in combat before.El Jefe said:Goruksblain is simply jealous and spiteful, and doesn't want to be left all alone in that horrid hammer sheath while it's owner bestows more affection on some hussy weapon!![]()