Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Crimson Longinus" data-source="post: 9477330" data-attributes="member: 7025508">So what is the standard of "humanocentric" that is being applied here? Because some seem to think Faerûn counts, and to me that seems pretty laughable. It is a total Mos Eisley kitchen sink setting, with crazy amount of species and them being very prominent.My current setting Artra is much less humanocentric than my previous one was,* but compared to most D&D settings it still doesn't have that many different intelligent species, though I think it has a lot.** And many of them are quite prominent, and there are constant interaction as well as some mixed societies. But I like to have more manageable amount of species, as I want them to actually feel different, and more you have harder that becomes to manage and they just start to blend together and lose meaning. For similar reasons I also like to have at least some humans around in the party. It is easier to portray the "aliens" when there are humans for contrast. * Which had the sort of Arthurian vibe with non-humans as rare and mystical.** Ten-ish that would at least in theory be playable.</blockquote>