Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GSL & SRD -- Comments, Questions, and Hopes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PatrickLawinger" data-source="post: 4322546" data-attributes="member: 2735"><p>That is the way I see it. The problem is, you have no idea what the future will bring. You could create the setting as system independent, and then try to create additional support products with the stats. The question is, if you do that, do those products prevent you from later making completely different OGL products supporting that same, non-OGL setting? I would say that it is a gray area, WotC could claim that you can't. It is something to have a lawyer answer. I don't think that they'd be successful with that claim in court, but what do I know, and, who would want to risk the legal fees to find out?</p><p></p><p>The setting "fluff" is something they can't take away from you or prevent you from using in another way, with the exception of the OGL based on what you agree to if you accept the license. NOTHING about the license would prevent you from, say, writing a series of short stories or novels for your game world. I can't remember where I saw a post that someone was actually worried about that.</p><p></p><p>Right now I am a small enough publisher that I haven't put out any products yet, and my first planned products are system independent anyway. I am focused on having enough finished products for that line to begin staggered, regular releases. If, probably when, I do any material for 4e I will most likely write up proposals for companies like Necromancer Games or Goodman Games. Like a lot of people, I have many, many ideas for 4e products, but I am waiting to play the game a bit more and get more used to the actual in-game use of the rules before I actually write anything up.</p><p></p><p>As for the GSL, I am just waiting a while to see if the license is the "final say" or not. Right now, I have my doubts that WotC is going to change the clause about going back to the OGL because a) I am sure someone at WotC insisted on it and b) if they DID change it the message boards would fill with posts saying, "see, they really will change the license at a moment's notice, we can't use this, WotC is so screwed up!"</p><p></p><p>Basically, my viewpoint as a "publisher" is a bit skewed toward patience. I have plenty to keep me busy right now and I have freelance writing and editing relationships with several companies that ARE going to make 4e/GSL material and have an avenue to publish material with them if I want to. I do think that some of the discussions have gotten far more heated than they really need to be.</p><p></p><p>Patrick</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PatrickLawinger, post: 4322546, member: 2735"] That is the way I see it. The problem is, you have no idea what the future will bring. You could create the setting as system independent, and then try to create additional support products with the stats. The question is, if you do that, do those products prevent you from later making completely different OGL products supporting that same, non-OGL setting? I would say that it is a gray area, WotC could claim that you can't. It is something to have a lawyer answer. I don't think that they'd be successful with that claim in court, but what do I know, and, who would want to risk the legal fees to find out? The setting "fluff" is something they can't take away from you or prevent you from using in another way, with the exception of the OGL based on what you agree to if you accept the license. NOTHING about the license would prevent you from, say, writing a series of short stories or novels for your game world. I can't remember where I saw a post that someone was actually worried about that. Right now I am a small enough publisher that I haven't put out any products yet, and my first planned products are system independent anyway. I am focused on having enough finished products for that line to begin staggered, regular releases. If, probably when, I do any material for 4e I will most likely write up proposals for companies like Necromancer Games or Goodman Games. Like a lot of people, I have many, many ideas for 4e products, but I am waiting to play the game a bit more and get more used to the actual in-game use of the rules before I actually write anything up. As for the GSL, I am just waiting a while to see if the license is the "final say" or not. Right now, I have my doubts that WotC is going to change the clause about going back to the OGL because a) I am sure someone at WotC insisted on it and b) if they DID change it the message boards would fill with posts saying, "see, they really will change the license at a moment's notice, we can't use this, WotC is so screwed up!" Basically, my viewpoint as a "publisher" is a bit skewed toward patience. I have plenty to keep me busy right now and I have freelance writing and editing relationships with several companies that ARE going to make 4e/GSL material and have an avenue to publish material with them if I want to. I do think that some of the discussions have gotten far more heated than they really need to be. Patrick [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
GSL & SRD -- Comments, Questions, and Hopes
Top