Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 7380035" data-attributes="member: 2525">Yes. The OP said it's about spamming a spell. I addressed it in a manner which does not result in any of the problems that come from spamming. You then responded to me talking about spamming again. Given my response dealt with the spamming issues, your response didn't make sense in that respect.  Ohhhhh now I know where this communication went wrong. You think spamming means something different!No, an aura does not spam a spell, at least not in the manner the OP is talking about or I was talking about. He meant the player SAYING IT over and over. It was taking him and his players out of the situation. A passive aura solves that issue. He's not objecting to the existence of the bonus, THAT isn't the "spamming" issue. He's fine with the players getting that +1d4 bonus. He says there are no balance issues involved with it.  He's bothered by the verbalization by the player of talking about the spell no matter what anyone does, and needing his PC to go get involved directly with everyone else's business. That's all solved by making it a passive aura. No more of the spamming issues he's referring to.  The PC need not be involved in what's going on, and the player need say nothing when it's happening, which means all those issues go away.He does not appear to care about spreading that bonus literally to everyone all the time...those are not the spamming issues he's raising.</blockquote>

Verification