Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Halflings are the 7th most popular 5e race
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lanefan" data-source="post: 9025223" data-attributes="member: 29398"><p>Because something has to be the baseline against which all others are compared. Humans - likely due to the fact we're all pretty familiar with them - are it.</p><p></p><p>Exactly. It's my whole point too, only from the reverse direction: playing an against-type class-species combo is going to be unusual, and will present a whole new set of challenges to that character's player.</p><p></p><p>How? Either you make those physical differences mechanically invisible (so why bother with physical differences) or you make the classes not dependent on abilities (so why bother with classes).</p><p></p><p>Of course the bell curves will overlap. That said, that a Strength-10 Human is average among its people while a Strength-10 Dwarf is a weakling among Dwarves.</p><p></p><p>So are you saying I should power up everything else to the level of what now stands out as overpowered?</p><p></p><p>Because when something like Dwarven Wizards stands out as overpowered there's only four solutions:</p><p></p><p>1. Ban that specific combination</p><p>2. Nerf ALL Wizards and-or ALL Dwarves such that the combo is no longer overpowered (and then have to fix loads of knock-on effects elsewhere)</p><p>3. Power up ALL other classes and-or ALL other species such that combos involving them are on par with this one</p><p>4. Do nothing and just accept the problem as part of the game.</p><p></p><p>The reason for the ALL in those is that I simply can't justify saying, for example, that only Dwarves who become Wizards don't get anything from high Con; and if I nerf those Dwarves then in the name of setting consistency I have to nerf all Dwarves equally. (thinking on it further I think I'd have the same problem with the idea of 13th-Age Necromancers not getting the same benefits from high Con that everyone else gets)</p><p></p><p>Of the above, IMO 4 isn't even worth considering; neither is 3 as I'm specifically trying to fight against power creep rather than add to it. 2 does nobody any favours. But you seem to be arguing for 3, and yet how can 3 happen without up-powering the whole game?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lanefan, post: 9025223, member: 29398"] Because something has to be the baseline against which all others are compared. Humans - likely due to the fact we're all pretty familiar with them - are it. Exactly. It's my whole point too, only from the reverse direction: playing an against-type class-species combo is going to be unusual, and will present a whole new set of challenges to that character's player. How? Either you make those physical differences mechanically invisible (so why bother with physical differences) or you make the classes not dependent on abilities (so why bother with classes). Of course the bell curves will overlap. That said, that a Strength-10 Human is average among its people while a Strength-10 Dwarf is a weakling among Dwarves. So are you saying I should power up everything else to the level of what now stands out as overpowered? Because when something like Dwarven Wizards stands out as overpowered there's only four solutions: 1. Ban that specific combination 2. Nerf ALL Wizards and-or ALL Dwarves such that the combo is no longer overpowered (and then have to fix loads of knock-on effects elsewhere) 3. Power up ALL other classes and-or ALL other species such that combos involving them are on par with this one 4. Do nothing and just accept the problem as part of the game. The reason for the ALL in those is that I simply can't justify saying, for example, that only Dwarves who become Wizards don't get anything from high Con; and if I nerf those Dwarves then in the name of setting consistency I have to nerf all Dwarves equally. (thinking on it further I think I'd have the same problem with the idea of 13th-Age Necromancers not getting the same benefits from high Con that everyone else gets) Of the above, IMO 4 isn't even worth considering; neither is 3 as I'm specifically trying to fight against power creep rather than add to it. 2 does nobody any favours. But you seem to be arguing for 3, and yet how can 3 happen without up-powering the whole game? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Halflings are the 7th most popular 5e race
Top