Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix SPOILERS!!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shayuri" data-source="post: 3641499" data-attributes="member: 4936"><p>Given the constraints of movie vs book, I think they did a fantastic job of cutting out the 'fat' that the book had time and space to deliver. This is in stark contrast to the Goblet of Fire, which included countless scenes that added little or nothing to the story (IMO), and excluded scenes that would have added quite a bit (again, IMO). </p><p></p><p>I found OotP's editing to be remarkably tight, yet omitting no vital details. My only 'complaint,' and that term is used loosely, is to point out that for a movie titled 'Order of the Phoenix,' the Order itself played a very small part in the story. Of course, when you boil it down, that's true of the book too...most of what they did there was tease Harry with knowledge then yank it away; driving him absolutely crazy. I think that still came across in this movie. It would have been nice to see more of the Order, if only because they're so delightfully peculiar.</p><p></p><p>I was particularly impressed by how they compressed several side stories (noteably the Cho Chang arc), retaining the basic -spirit- of the plots, but in fractions of the necessary exposition time. Also of note was the excellent use of visual details (newspaper headlines glimpsed, expressions of students in the backgrounds, etc) that conveyed thematic and tone information without requiring any dialogue. They created a hostile, oppressive atmosphere towards Harry (thus helping explain his behavior) without wasting a single word...and often simultaneously with other important scenes.</p><p></p><p>...I admit, my reaction is based largely on the -mechanics- of the movie...this is because the content of the story is much as it was presented in the book, even with the cuts in the movie's content. Problems with the storyline that existed in the book are still in the movie, and the myriad explanations that apply to those problems in the book still apply to the movie too. I don't really want to get into them. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> Because my problems with the movies in the past have been largely problems of the mechanics of moviemaking, it seems fair to judge this one on the same yardstick. And really, I found OotP to be very refreshing. It wasn't Citizen Kane or anything, but especially in comparison to the lackluster and disappointing Goblet of Fire, Order of the Phoenix strikes me as an excellent interpretation of the source material, and well adapted for the big screen.</p><p></p><p>Mew.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shayuri, post: 3641499, member: 4936"] Given the constraints of movie vs book, I think they did a fantastic job of cutting out the 'fat' that the book had time and space to deliver. This is in stark contrast to the Goblet of Fire, which included countless scenes that added little or nothing to the story (IMO), and excluded scenes that would have added quite a bit (again, IMO). I found OotP's editing to be remarkably tight, yet omitting no vital details. My only 'complaint,' and that term is used loosely, is to point out that for a movie titled 'Order of the Phoenix,' the Order itself played a very small part in the story. Of course, when you boil it down, that's true of the book too...most of what they did there was tease Harry with knowledge then yank it away; driving him absolutely crazy. I think that still came across in this movie. It would have been nice to see more of the Order, if only because they're so delightfully peculiar. I was particularly impressed by how they compressed several side stories (noteably the Cho Chang arc), retaining the basic -spirit- of the plots, but in fractions of the necessary exposition time. Also of note was the excellent use of visual details (newspaper headlines glimpsed, expressions of students in the backgrounds, etc) that conveyed thematic and tone information without requiring any dialogue. They created a hostile, oppressive atmosphere towards Harry (thus helping explain his behavior) without wasting a single word...and often simultaneously with other important scenes. ...I admit, my reaction is based largely on the -mechanics- of the movie...this is because the content of the story is much as it was presented in the book, even with the cuts in the movie's content. Problems with the storyline that existed in the book are still in the movie, and the myriad explanations that apply to those problems in the book still apply to the movie too. I don't really want to get into them. :) Because my problems with the movies in the past have been largely problems of the mechanics of moviemaking, it seems fair to judge this one on the same yardstick. And really, I found OotP to be very refreshing. It wasn't Citizen Kane or anything, but especially in comparison to the lackluster and disappointing Goblet of Fire, Order of the Phoenix strikes me as an excellent interpretation of the source material, and well adapted for the big screen. Mew. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix SPOILERS!!!
Top