Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Help Me Combine the Wizard and Sorcerer Classes (+)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EzekielRaiden" data-source="post: 9614503" data-attributes="member: 6790260"><p>There are generally three accepted paths to power: Either you were born with it (innate talent, magic-in-the-blood, one of your parents was a monarch, etc.), or you earned it through training and effort, or it was bestowed upon you because of something you did. The fourth, often-not-accepted path to power, is bargaining for it.</p><p></p><p>Note that this is also seen in both religious hierarchies and aristocracies: Either you are born into a special role (e.g. you are the child of the previous prophet/monarch), or you studied and trained and passed some kind of test or won some kind of award through a display of that effort, or you were a great general or preacher or whatever and thus some authority vested you with the power as recognition of your skill. Or...you just bought you way into the position, whether through bribes or promises or alliances or whatever else.</p><p></p><p>So it seems to me that, if your goal is to collapse all of the arcane classes into one singular class that then splits by subclass, you should have one subclass to represent each of the above four paths: innate, trained, endowed, and bought.</p><p></p><p>You've got innate (Sorcerer) and trained (Wizard). That leaves endowed power and bought power. Warlock is obviously the latter, so this leaves open the question of what endowed power should be. And, for that, I think <em>Bard</em> actually makes a lot of sense. Both Bards and Wizards involve training, but there's a much greater emphasis on <em>personal output</em> for Bards; their magic is less a matter of gaining understanding, as it is about achieving great performance. </p><p></p><p>So why not have Bards be bestowed power by the College of Bards? They demand great performances in whatever field--poetry, song, dance, oratory, whatever--which is less about having technical skill, and more about adding something great to the College corpus. Greater magic requires enchanting more people--so the College benefits from having more Bards doing more performances in more places. Effectively, Bard magic <em>is its own cause</em>; it has power because people believe it has power, and people believe it has power because the College drives its members to always push the envelope of what performance can <em>do</em>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EzekielRaiden, post: 9614503, member: 6790260"] There are generally three accepted paths to power: Either you were born with it (innate talent, magic-in-the-blood, one of your parents was a monarch, etc.), or you earned it through training and effort, or it was bestowed upon you because of something you did. The fourth, often-not-accepted path to power, is bargaining for it. Note that this is also seen in both religious hierarchies and aristocracies: Either you are born into a special role (e.g. you are the child of the previous prophet/monarch), or you studied and trained and passed some kind of test or won some kind of award through a display of that effort, or you were a great general or preacher or whatever and thus some authority vested you with the power as recognition of your skill. Or...you just bought you way into the position, whether through bribes or promises or alliances or whatever else. So it seems to me that, if your goal is to collapse all of the arcane classes into one singular class that then splits by subclass, you should have one subclass to represent each of the above four paths: innate, trained, endowed, and bought. You've got innate (Sorcerer) and trained (Wizard). That leaves endowed power and bought power. Warlock is obviously the latter, so this leaves open the question of what endowed power should be. And, for that, I think [I]Bard[/I] actually makes a lot of sense. Both Bards and Wizards involve training, but there's a much greater emphasis on [I]personal output[/I] for Bards; their magic is less a matter of gaining understanding, as it is about achieving great performance. So why not have Bards be bestowed power by the College of Bards? They demand great performances in whatever field--poetry, song, dance, oratory, whatever--which is less about having technical skill, and more about adding something great to the College corpus. Greater magic requires enchanting more people--so the College benefits from having more Bards doing more performances in more places. Effectively, Bard magic [I]is its own cause[/I]; it has power because people believe it has power, and people believe it has power because the College drives its members to always push the envelope of what performance can [I]do[/I]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Help Me Combine the Wizard and Sorcerer Classes (+)
Top