True.horses were in the Americas before the last ice age maybe make it so they just never died off?
...but MOAS!
True.horses were in the Americas before the last ice age maybe make it so they just never died off?
why not both?True.
...but MOAS!
Personal choice. Probably varies tribe by tribe if they’re both still around. probab wouldn’t coexist in the same tribe.why not both?
moas are scouts and riders as they are harder to armour up so they are all light cavalry but faster, better in brush/ heavy forrest and more mobile, the house being more versatile like the human of d&d ground mounts.Personal choice. Probably varies tribe by tribe if they’re both still around. probab wouldn’t coexist in the same tribe.
Isn't the "large territories to explore" in itself part of the new world trope?Ideally, we could go with a colonial-era technology level, but without the trope of the ''new world'' to explore and conquer. One of the main draw of the Americas is their large territories. Its pretty easy to have a bunch of peoples on the main land while still having a lot of wilderness to explore.
Sorry for the "subject crashing" but i'm a french game designer and one of the modules of my OSR D&D-esque game "Coureurs d'Orages" is precisely a "western fantasy" module.The current thought exercise is more to try to see what would it be like if D&D was designed, say, by an European women with a taste for American history in an attic somewhere in Denmark instead of an American man with a taste for European history in a basement somewhere in the American midwest
See, I'm a french-canadian guy of both scots settlers and first-nation descent, and sometime I find funny that most of my time playing pretend history is set in a fantasy version of the old world with only few things taken from our actual fictions.
Especially when so many D&D-ism are way more ''wild-west with swords'' than actual European medieval society.
Isn't the "large territories to explore" in itself part of the new world trope?
Not just horses, but significant amounts of domesticated livestock in general. Then either the indigenous nations would have had the chance to develop immunities to diseases similar to the Europeans or transmitted back similarly depopulating epidemics that would have equalized some of the terms of the contact.Because the natives would have a viable alternative to European horses, the conquering of the Americas would probably take a different trajectory.