Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Help with an Alignment System
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SimonTVesper" data-source="post: 5708059" data-attributes="member: 50397"><p>I'm working on running a Planescape setting with 4th Edition rules. My intent is to create an alignment system that is 1) based on the classic AD&D alignments, and 2) that provides some form of measurable game benefit. The final product does not have to be an exact copy, nor does it even need to closely reflect the original. All that matters is that it is something that can be fitted into the Planescape setting.</p><p></p><p>I have a few ideas already, inspired in part by discussion on this and other forums.</p><p></p><p>For example, the Wereworlf game (1st edition, I think) had a way of keeping track of and rewarding character behavior. The books outline specific actions and how they relate to different measures of Renown. I might use something like this, whereby the four components of Alignment (good, evil, law and chaos) are tracked by the player with a point system. More points in one component means a leaning toward that alignment. For example, a lawful good character would start with 10 points divided between law and good (most likely 5 each). If the character performs notably good acts (based on concrete examples), he advances his good rating.</p><p></p><p>I see problems already, though, which is why I'm soliciting help. What kind of actions can I define as good, or evil, or whatever? Should I look for different qualifying adjectives, like honor or glory? (Those two are terms used in Werewolf, BTW.) Once I've decided how to define alignment, what actions belong to each category? What sort of benefits can I provide to characters for having an alignment score?</p><p></p><p>For the purposes of this discussion, I welcome thoughts and opinions about the old alignment system, including stong negative ones, because it helps to identify the problems. After all, you can't fix something if you don't know what's wrong with it. However, I want it known that I intend to fix the problems, because, as I see it, alignment is integral to the Planescape experience. I could simply use 2nd edition rules, but I've grown fond of 4th edition mechanics, and I'd rather my players get some use of the books they've invested in.</p><p></p><p>Final note: if you know of a thread that already discusses these concepts, please let me know. I've been searching, but I haven't found any so far. Any help anyone can provide will be greatly appreciated.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SimonTVesper, post: 5708059, member: 50397"] I'm working on running a Planescape setting with 4th Edition rules. My intent is to create an alignment system that is 1) based on the classic AD&D alignments, and 2) that provides some form of measurable game benefit. The final product does not have to be an exact copy, nor does it even need to closely reflect the original. All that matters is that it is something that can be fitted into the Planescape setting. I have a few ideas already, inspired in part by discussion on this and other forums. For example, the Wereworlf game (1st edition, I think) had a way of keeping track of and rewarding character behavior. The books outline specific actions and how they relate to different measures of Renown. I might use something like this, whereby the four components of Alignment (good, evil, law and chaos) are tracked by the player with a point system. More points in one component means a leaning toward that alignment. For example, a lawful good character would start with 10 points divided between law and good (most likely 5 each). If the character performs notably good acts (based on concrete examples), he advances his good rating. I see problems already, though, which is why I'm soliciting help. What kind of actions can I define as good, or evil, or whatever? Should I look for different qualifying adjectives, like honor or glory? (Those two are terms used in Werewolf, BTW.) Once I've decided how to define alignment, what actions belong to each category? What sort of benefits can I provide to characters for having an alignment score? For the purposes of this discussion, I welcome thoughts and opinions about the old alignment system, including stong negative ones, because it helps to identify the problems. After all, you can't fix something if you don't know what's wrong with it. However, I want it known that I intend to fix the problems, because, as I see it, alignment is integral to the Planescape experience. I could simply use 2nd edition rules, but I've grown fond of 4th edition mechanics, and I'd rather my players get some use of the books they've invested in. Final note: if you know of a thread that already discusses these concepts, please let me know. I've been searching, but I haven't found any so far. Any help anyone can provide will be greatly appreciated. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Help with an Alignment System
Top