• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

HideyhideyhideyHIVE, Hodehodehodeho

Status
Not open for further replies.

log in or register to remove this ad


Saw Star Trek with my GF after playing hookie from work. She actually liked it.. Sadly, I think
Doc. Brown would shake his head at what happened in that movie
.

Saw it on Friday too with my Ex. She's not much of a scifi-fan though she has always liked the Next Generation ST. She loved the movie.

I can't decide... It was awesome scifi CGI feast and even the plot was pretty good... But I have no idea how I'm supposed to react to the timeline changes... Then again, how important was "that planet" to the continuity anyhow? As far as I can think of, it doesn't change anything MAJOR on the series or movies...

EDIT: Oh, and Nokia is still around in 200 years... Now, why do I have a feeling that the communicators are actually Nokia's latest line of products in 23rd century :D...
 
Last edited:

What I wonder is if they will even try to save "the other planet?" Seriously without all the advanced scientists from "that planet" how can they build "the DeLorien?" That's not even mentioning the paradox created once the "Shadow-esque" ship falls into the space anomaly.

That doesn't even answer if what happened to "that planet" would be known to everyone in the alternate reality.
 


Seriously without all the advanced scientists from "that planet" how can they build "the DeLorien?"

Ah, but they still do have the most brilliant minds, and one that has century worth of advanced science in his brains... :D.

And the "Colony" means that it could serve as the place they visit in the series/movies whenever they visit "the Planet"... Which is very rare anyways and always looks more desolate than it should...

Anyways, my biggest gripe: Where is Gary Mitchell?! Yes, you could explain him off with the timeline changes, but I seriously think he should've been there...

PS. You're not Trekkie enough if you don't know off-hand who I'm referring to :D
 

Ah, but they still do have the most brilliant minds, and one that has century worth of advanced science in his brains... :D.

And the "Colony" means that it could serve as the place they visit in the series/movies whenever they visit "the Planet"... Which is very rare anyways and always looks more desolate than it should...

Anyways, my biggest gripe: Where is Gary Mitchell?! Yes, you could explain him off with the timeline changes, but I seriously think he should've been there...

PS. You're not Trekkie enough if you don't know off-hand who I'm referring to :D
:(

I recognize the name, but can't put a face or role/purpose/character to it. :(

Wait, wasn't he a friend of Kirk or something? That later turned against him?

Did anyone catch that one of the Starfleet Admirals was called "Barrett"? Seemed to me as a small nod to Majel Barrett-Roddenberry...
 

:(

I recognize the name, but can't put a face or role/purpose/character to it. :(

Wait, wasn't he a friend of Kirk or something? That later turned against him?

He was Kirk's best friend during academy. And the main "villain" of the Pilot Episode... :D He really should've been there :(
 

Hmmmm.....

Gary_Mitchell_before.jpg

Leonard_McCoy_(alternate_reality).jpg


Coincidence?
 


Status
Not open for further replies.

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top