Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
NOW LIVE! Today's the day you meet your new best friend. You don’t have to leave Wolfy behind... In 'Pets & Sidekicks' your companions level up with you!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
High Level 5e - any actual play? How's the balance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celtavian" data-source="post: 6570794" data-attributes="member: 5834"><p>If you read the <em>banish</em> spell, it permanently banishes creatures native to other planes permanently. The spell duration is irrelevant. <em>Dispel magic</em> can do the same thing.</p><p></p><p>Dave's claim was that he had multiple casters with extremely high DCs ready to cast <em>banishment</em> in every major encounter. Of course in scenarios like that, <em>planar binding</em> is of marginal use. But that isn't how most encounters are designed. A summoned creature will be very effective in 90% plus of encounters, including end game dragon encounters which don't usually have casters present. It's not as easy to get rid of summoned creatures as Dave makes it sound. A summoned creature or three combined with a <em>simulacrum</em> and regular spell casting is quite potent for damage dealing. As potent or more than casting <em>foresight</em> on your fighter and letting him swing at things. You can also summon specialized creatures at higher level depending on your needs, such as creatures immune to the breath weapons of dragons or capable of casting spells on your behalf. </p><p></p><p>Contrary to what Dave says, I think he does have to prove that tactics involving <em>planar binding</em> and <em>simulacrum</em> don't work in the standard game (as in not his custom game) for people to believe what he claims. He made a false claim that those abilities don't work as well as others think. That only applies to his game with customized monsters, not the game as it is designed. What if a DM in a regular game has some wizard pull those tactics out and they toss his game sideways. What will that player think? Gee, I should have made customized monsters that favor martials like Dave? It was a ridiculous assertion DaveDash didn't want to defend because he couldn't defend it. I find it strange when someone is proven wrong, they don't admit it and adjust their viewpoint. It seems to be par for the course for the Internet.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celtavian, post: 6570794, member: 5834"] If you read the [I]banish[/I] spell, it permanently banishes creatures native to other planes permanently. The spell duration is irrelevant. [I]Dispel magic[/I] can do the same thing. Dave's claim was that he had multiple casters with extremely high DCs ready to cast [I]banishment[/I] in every major encounter. Of course in scenarios like that, [I]planar binding[/I] is of marginal use. But that isn't how most encounters are designed. A summoned creature will be very effective in 90% plus of encounters, including end game dragon encounters which don't usually have casters present. It's not as easy to get rid of summoned creatures as Dave makes it sound. A summoned creature or three combined with a [I]simulacrum[/I] and regular spell casting is quite potent for damage dealing. As potent or more than casting [I]foresight[/I] on your fighter and letting him swing at things. You can also summon specialized creatures at higher level depending on your needs, such as creatures immune to the breath weapons of dragons or capable of casting spells on your behalf. Contrary to what Dave says, I think he does have to prove that tactics involving [I]planar binding[/I] and [I]simulacrum[/I] don't work in the standard game (as in not his custom game) for people to believe what he claims. He made a false claim that those abilities don't work as well as others think. That only applies to his game with customized monsters, not the game as it is designed. What if a DM in a regular game has some wizard pull those tactics out and they toss his game sideways. What will that player think? Gee, I should have made customized monsters that favor martials like Dave? It was a ridiculous assertion DaveDash didn't want to defend because he couldn't defend it. I find it strange when someone is proven wrong, they don't admit it and adjust their viewpoint. It seems to be par for the course for the Internet. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
High Level 5e - any actual play? How's the balance?
Top