Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Yaarel" data-source="post: 7241919" data-attributes="member: 58172">Obviously training helps combat effectiveness. I like the way 5e handles the proficiency bonus across levels for various d20 rolls.But skill clusters might effect attack and damage too. I assume some people are more ‘talented’ than others at shooting a rifle and so on, even if untrained.With regard to D&amp;D Nonhuman races, the other races are ... Nonhuman. They dont have human genetics, they dont have human brains, and so on. I assume, when comparing races to each other, some are necessarily more talented − socially, physically, mentally, spiritually. And tend to do better at certain skill sets.For me, race ability differences make sense. In this context, ‘race’ means a different species of sapient beings.Mellored, out of curiosity, what is it about the race ability score improvements, that you find objectionable?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Yaarel, post: 7241919, member: 58172"] Obviously training helps combat effectiveness. I like the way 5e handles the proficiency bonus across levels for various d20 rolls. But skill clusters might effect attack and damage too. I assume some people are more ‘talented’ than others at shooting a rifle and so on, even if untrained. With regard to D&D Nonhuman races, the other races are ... Nonhuman. They dont have human genetics, they dont have human brains, and so on. I assume, when comparing races to each other, some are necessarily more talented − socially, physically, mentally, spiritually. And tend to do better at certain skill sets. For me, race ability differences make sense. In this context, ‘race’ means a different species of sapient beings. Mellored, out of curiosity, what is it about the race ability score improvements, that you find objectionable? [/QUOTE]

Verification