Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Stalker0" data-source="post: 8535641" data-attributes="member: 5889">Its always a bit hard to seperate what should be a true new &quot;class&quot; versus a subclass or even just feats, etc.I think the occultist/witch concept can be done with the warlock chassis pretty well. We already have the Eldritch knight and hexblade for swordmage type concepts (though I think there is a more magic/less martial blend that could be a class).The &quot;scholar&quot; class could make some sense, similar to the old factotum or archivist concepts, someone who wields knowledge as a weapon.You could have a bonded magic item class. There is a common fantasy motiff of a person bonded with an item and the two growing stronger together.I think you could seperate an &quot;elementalist&quot; from the wizard/sorc chassis. Aka is you really want to be just chucking fire or ice and nothing else, this is the class for you. That's a very common concept.I could see a priest class, which really strips out the warrior aspects from the cleric and focuses on pure divine power.A master of forms (3e binder) type class can be fun. The 3e version was bad, but the concept of summoning different forms of power granting you different abilities is a neat concept that you do see in fantasy.A class focused on auras is another class concept that is untapped.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Stalker0, post: 8535641, member: 5889"] Its always a bit hard to seperate what should be a true new "class" versus a subclass or even just feats, etc. I think the occultist/witch concept can be done with the warlock chassis pretty well. We already have the Eldritch knight and hexblade for swordmage type concepts (though I think there is a more magic/less martial blend that could be a class). The "scholar" class could make some sense, similar to the old factotum or archivist concepts, someone who wields knowledge as a weapon. You could have a [B]bonded magic item class.[/B] There is a common fantasy motiff of a person bonded with an item and the two growing stronger together. I think you could seperate an [B]"elementalist"[/B] from the wizard/sorc chassis. Aka is you really want to be just chucking fire or ice and nothing else, this is the class for you. That's a very common concept. I could see a [B]priest[/B] class, which really strips out the warrior aspects from the cleric and focuses on pure divine power. A [B]master of forms (3e binder) [/B]type class can be fun. The 3e version was bad, but the concept of summoning different forms of power granting you different abilities is a neat concept that you do see in fantasy. A[B] class focused on auras[/B] is another class concept that is untapped. [/QUOTE]

Verification