Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
House rule for Going below 0 hp and get up again with a good berry or a healing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 7526385" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>I used the Exhaustion track <em>in place of</em> the 3 Death Saves track in my <em>Curse of Strahd</em> campaign and it worked well enough that I'm using the system again (amended a bit) in my current Eberron campaign. How my system currently works:</p><p></p><p>First, I changed up the levels of Exhaustion. They now are:</p><p></p><p>Level 1: Speed to half.</p><p>Level 2: Half Max HP.</p><p>Level 3: Disadvantage on attacks and saving throws.</p><p>Level 4: Disadvantage on skill checks.</p><p>Level 5: Unconscious.</p><p>Level 6: Death.</p><p></p><p>When a PC reaches 0 HP they are not "unconscious" per se... they instead just fall down dazed and completely out of it. The game mechanics are the same as the Unconscious condition, but I don't say fluff-wise that they are out cold. When their turn comes around again, they have to make a Death saving throw like they would normally. If they fail, they take 1 failed death save and drop to Level 1 on the Exhaustion chart. For every failed death save after that, they drop down another level. This continues until they have failed their 6th death save and drop to Level 6 on the chart, Death.</p><p></p><p>Unlike standard death saves, Exhaustion levels do not disappear when the PC gains hit points to bring them above 0. Their exhaustion level remains, as does all the penalties associated with their level. And should they get knocked down to 0 HP again, they pick up where they left off on the chart as they fail more death saves. After the combat is over and regardless of how many HP they regain through healing and spending hit dice and such, they are still at the Exhaustion level they were at through failed death saves.</p><p></p><p>In terms of regain Exhaustion levels, I've changed that up as well. First off, there is a new chart that shows how many long rests it takes to remove a level of exhaustion. Note that these rests are cumulative-- each extra level of Exhaustion you need to remove based purely on rest doubles the amount of time you need to rest:</p><p></p><p>To remove one level of Exhaustion: 1 Long Rest</p><p>To remove a second level of Exhaustion: 2 Long Rests (meaning 3 LR total)</p><p>To remove a third level of Exhaustion: 4 Long Rests (meaning 7 LR or a week total)</p><p>To remove a fourth level of Exhaustion: 7 Long Rests (meaning 14 LR or two weeks total)</p><p>To remove a fifth level of Exhaustion: 14 Long Rests (meaning 28 LR or an entire month total)</p><p></p><p>So if a PC gets knocked down to Level 5 Exhaustion, it will take a month of Downtime for them to recover. Does that suck? Oh yeah! Majorly! A character could be removed from action for an entire month in-game. Now granted, as I'm using the Downtime rules and I have 15 total players that come and go every-other-week, the player of the Exhaused PC might not actually have to miss any actual sessions due to their PC being out of it. The story of the campaign might easily see the two weeks to a month happen "between sessions". But because that isn't guaranteed... this does result in players now acting in a way I feel is very important:</p><p></p><p>All the players know that due to the harsh penalties of reaching 0 HP... it is imperative that all PCs help "spread the wealth" as it were when it comes to running into combat and taking the occasional hit to absorb some damage. In the past over time I found there was nothing more irritating than an Archer ranger player (for instance) refusing to enter melee because they felt like they were a "ranged" character and thus though they were a glass cannon-- despite having just as many hit points as the melee fighters and paladins, and even more HP than the melee rogues and monks who stood in there and took the hits. Any time these rangers got engaged in melee, the response was always "Well, that's it, I'm dead!" It was a stupid attitude then, and a stupid attitude now... and thus this system of mine pretty much assures everyone that they CAN'T just let the platemail-wearing Fighter be the only one in melee, get knocked down to 0, then healed back up, then knocked down again, etc. etc. while everyone else stays at a safe distance. Because those Exhaustion levels will catch up pretty quickly, and everyone will find that a Tank with Level 3 Exhaustion that is attacking and saving with Disadvantage and who need an entire week of rest before he's good again, makes for pretty poor adventuring. Which is exactly the way I like to run it. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>PS: Two other additional rules I have in my system is that any Exhausted PC who spends their first Long Rest being tended to by another party member (who uses their Long Rest to do the tending and thus not get any other benefits) can get a second Exhaustion level removed "for free". On top of that... I also rule that the <em>Lesser Restoration</em> spell can be cast on an Exhausted character <em>once</em> to remove one level of Exhaustion "for free" as well. A second Lesser Restoration spell will not do any additional help until all levels of Exhaustion have been removed, at which time both it and the "tending" bonus are reset. So things are actually not <em>as</em> onerous as they might seem, as a healer who spends a Long Rest first casting <em>Lesser Restoration</em> and then tending to an Exhausted PC can move them from Level 3 Exhaustion to no longer exhausted in a single Long Rest. But that's just for one PC... the others better have available party members to tend to them too. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite2" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 7526385, member: 7006"] I used the Exhaustion track [I]in place of[/I] the 3 Death Saves track in my [I]Curse of Strahd[/I] campaign and it worked well enough that I'm using the system again (amended a bit) in my current Eberron campaign. How my system currently works: First, I changed up the levels of Exhaustion. They now are: Level 1: Speed to half. Level 2: Half Max HP. Level 3: Disadvantage on attacks and saving throws. Level 4: Disadvantage on skill checks. Level 5: Unconscious. Level 6: Death. When a PC reaches 0 HP they are not "unconscious" per se... they instead just fall down dazed and completely out of it. The game mechanics are the same as the Unconscious condition, but I don't say fluff-wise that they are out cold. When their turn comes around again, they have to make a Death saving throw like they would normally. If they fail, they take 1 failed death save and drop to Level 1 on the Exhaustion chart. For every failed death save after that, they drop down another level. This continues until they have failed their 6th death save and drop to Level 6 on the chart, Death. Unlike standard death saves, Exhaustion levels do not disappear when the PC gains hit points to bring them above 0. Their exhaustion level remains, as does all the penalties associated with their level. And should they get knocked down to 0 HP again, they pick up where they left off on the chart as they fail more death saves. After the combat is over and regardless of how many HP they regain through healing and spending hit dice and such, they are still at the Exhaustion level they were at through failed death saves. In terms of regain Exhaustion levels, I've changed that up as well. First off, there is a new chart that shows how many long rests it takes to remove a level of exhaustion. Note that these rests are cumulative-- each extra level of Exhaustion you need to remove based purely on rest doubles the amount of time you need to rest: To remove one level of Exhaustion: 1 Long Rest To remove a second level of Exhaustion: 2 Long Rests (meaning 3 LR total) To remove a third level of Exhaustion: 4 Long Rests (meaning 7 LR or a week total) To remove a fourth level of Exhaustion: 7 Long Rests (meaning 14 LR or two weeks total) To remove a fifth level of Exhaustion: 14 Long Rests (meaning 28 LR or an entire month total) So if a PC gets knocked down to Level 5 Exhaustion, it will take a month of Downtime for them to recover. Does that suck? Oh yeah! Majorly! A character could be removed from action for an entire month in-game. Now granted, as I'm using the Downtime rules and I have 15 total players that come and go every-other-week, the player of the Exhaused PC might not actually have to miss any actual sessions due to their PC being out of it. The story of the campaign might easily see the two weeks to a month happen "between sessions". But because that isn't guaranteed... this does result in players now acting in a way I feel is very important: All the players know that due to the harsh penalties of reaching 0 HP... it is imperative that all PCs help "spread the wealth" as it were when it comes to running into combat and taking the occasional hit to absorb some damage. In the past over time I found there was nothing more irritating than an Archer ranger player (for instance) refusing to enter melee because they felt like they were a "ranged" character and thus though they were a glass cannon-- despite having just as many hit points as the melee fighters and paladins, and even more HP than the melee rogues and monks who stood in there and took the hits. Any time these rangers got engaged in melee, the response was always "Well, that's it, I'm dead!" It was a stupid attitude then, and a stupid attitude now... and thus this system of mine pretty much assures everyone that they CAN'T just let the platemail-wearing Fighter be the only one in melee, get knocked down to 0, then healed back up, then knocked down again, etc. etc. while everyone else stays at a safe distance. Because those Exhaustion levels will catch up pretty quickly, and everyone will find that a Tank with Level 3 Exhaustion that is attacking and saving with Disadvantage and who need an entire week of rest before he's good again, makes for pretty poor adventuring. Which is exactly the way I like to run it. :) PS: Two other additional rules I have in my system is that any Exhausted PC who spends their first Long Rest being tended to by another party member (who uses their Long Rest to do the tending and thus not get any other benefits) can get a second Exhaustion level removed "for free". On top of that... I also rule that the [I]Lesser Restoration[/I] spell can be cast on an Exhausted character [I]once[/I] to remove one level of Exhaustion "for free" as well. A second Lesser Restoration spell will not do any additional help until all levels of Exhaustion have been removed, at which time both it and the "tending" bonus are reset. So things are actually not [I]as[/I] onerous as they might seem, as a healer who spends a Long Rest first casting [I]Lesser Restoration[/I] and then tending to an Exhausted PC can move them from Level 3 Exhaustion to no longer exhausted in a single Long Rest. But that's just for one PC... the others better have available party members to tend to them too. ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
House rule for Going below 0 hp and get up again with a good berry or a healing
Top