Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is LIVE! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How Can You Politely Say, "Your Character Sucks?"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pawsplay" data-source="post: 5074250" data-attributes="member: 15538"><p>Bunk. I'm trained to do administer standardized tests, and I know people within a given field vary widely in their particular talents. There are plenty of people who are fantastic surgeons or car mechanics or whatever who do not have minds that are generally exceptional. If a character has a 14 Int, and most fighters have a 10, and the sharpest minds have 16s to 20s, the character is pretty darn brilliant from the standpoint of the ordinary person. Or from a more abstract rationale outside the game world... it's a few points, so what?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Whichever. The point is that if he's 4 points behind at level 1, he's 4 points behind at level 30, or more or less, because there are so many other variables.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't think so. Both are measures of optimization. Whether in AD&D or 4e, a fighter can use a good Strength.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In many respects, yes.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Simply because someone starts as a wizard's apprentice does not mean they will end up being the Arch Wizard of the High Tower, nor does every plucky squire grow up to the nationa's premier jousting knight. Not every legendary character is going to fit a narrow definition of optimization within the game system. Arthur was not the combat monster in the group; Lancelot was. Paksenarrion, in Elizabeth Moon's stories, does not have exceptional skills as a swordsman, but she gains them, even though she is never as fluid as the best she knows, even at a peak where she can outfight many of them.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That isn't the idea I had in mind. Any character can die.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In the d20 version of the Star Wars game, both took a detour from their primary Jedi skills to take levels in Ace Pilot. It's also not a given that either had truly exceptional ability scores apart from an abnormal Dex and a decent Wis and Int. They simply became very high level characters.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Magic weapons didn't really "make up for" low Str in AD&D. They could just as easily enhance an already powerful powerful character. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, we already covered that with the example I gave above about the level 1 character versus the level 30 character. Which means the 4 point spread isn't any better at level 30... but it's no worse, either.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, that's not why. There has never been a "make up for" set of abilities in D&D. It has always been power on top of whatever you had before. There is nothing vile about optimizing, nor is it clear that narrower variation between PCs makes for a better game. In any case, it makes 4e an easier game to mess around with, because the expected variation is so narrow, you almost can't make yourself unable to hit somehting.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But that's not what I was doing. I just liked the idea of the character. I never felt gimped, useless, or impractical, although I realized other characters might have some advantages in some ways. </p><p></p><p>I say, give the character the stat you want for them. If the picture in your mind is of an incompetent character, then the problem is the concept, not a stat. Saying, "Hm, I see him as more of a 14, bright not but brilliant, a plucky, hard-working soul more than a gifted mage," you are still picturing a competent character and it's hard to go wrong in that direction. Even though it might give someone fits who feels every character has to be hot-rodded. Where does this need to be in control come from? It's not like D&D is going to injure you or steal your money if your character is not strong enough.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pawsplay, post: 5074250, member: 15538"] Bunk. I'm trained to do administer standardized tests, and I know people within a given field vary widely in their particular talents. There are plenty of people who are fantastic surgeons or car mechanics or whatever who do not have minds that are generally exceptional. If a character has a 14 Int, and most fighters have a 10, and the sharpest minds have 16s to 20s, the character is pretty darn brilliant from the standpoint of the ordinary person. Or from a more abstract rationale outside the game world... it's a few points, so what? Whichever. The point is that if he's 4 points behind at level 1, he's 4 points behind at level 30, or more or less, because there are so many other variables. I don't think so. Both are measures of optimization. Whether in AD&D or 4e, a fighter can use a good Strength. In many respects, yes. Simply because someone starts as a wizard's apprentice does not mean they will end up being the Arch Wizard of the High Tower, nor does every plucky squire grow up to the nationa's premier jousting knight. Not every legendary character is going to fit a narrow definition of optimization within the game system. Arthur was not the combat monster in the group; Lancelot was. Paksenarrion, in Elizabeth Moon's stories, does not have exceptional skills as a swordsman, but she gains them, even though she is never as fluid as the best she knows, even at a peak where she can outfight many of them. That isn't the idea I had in mind. Any character can die. In the d20 version of the Star Wars game, both took a detour from their primary Jedi skills to take levels in Ace Pilot. It's also not a given that either had truly exceptional ability scores apart from an abnormal Dex and a decent Wis and Int. They simply became very high level characters. Magic weapons didn't really "make up for" low Str in AD&D. They could just as easily enhance an already powerful powerful character. Yeah, we already covered that with the example I gave above about the level 1 character versus the level 30 character. Which means the 4 point spread isn't any better at level 30... but it's no worse, either. No, that's not why. There has never been a "make up for" set of abilities in D&D. It has always been power on top of whatever you had before. There is nothing vile about optimizing, nor is it clear that narrower variation between PCs makes for a better game. In any case, it makes 4e an easier game to mess around with, because the expected variation is so narrow, you almost can't make yourself unable to hit somehting. But that's not what I was doing. I just liked the idea of the character. I never felt gimped, useless, or impractical, although I realized other characters might have some advantages in some ways. I say, give the character the stat you want for them. If the picture in your mind is of an incompetent character, then the problem is the concept, not a stat. Saying, "Hm, I see him as more of a 14, bright not but brilliant, a plucky, hard-working soul more than a gifted mage," you are still picturing a competent character and it's hard to go wrong in that direction. Even though it might give someone fits who feels every character has to be hot-rodded. Where does this need to be in control come from? It's not like D&D is going to injure you or steal your money if your character is not strong enough. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How Can You Politely Say, "Your Character Sucks?"
Top