Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="clearstream" data-source="post: 7799012" data-attributes="member: 71699">As a deck, draws are made without replacement. The two examples attached are from a number of identical sheets, so that I experimented with... about 100 characters. The top row of characters uses the light-blue range, the middle row uses the mid-blue range, and the bottom row uses the dark-blue range. The Excel sheet uses a plug-in that shuffles contents of a range.I was surprised to see a 15 (on the Forest Gnome Wizard) as a hypergeometric distribution made that look like a 1-2% chance. I've probably made some errors... the fidelity is good-enough for my purposes! One thing I felt particularly satisfied with is that with luck and focus a character could work towards a 20 stat... but they would have to make trade-offs to get it and I think it would feel genuinely exceptional. I also much prefer where the base range (6-15) falls against MM creatures (e.g. Giant strength scores!)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="clearstream, post: 7799012, member: 71699"] As a deck, draws are made without replacement. The two examples attached are from a number of identical sheets, so that I experimented with... about 100 characters. The top row of characters uses the light-blue range, the middle row uses the mid-blue range, and the bottom row uses the dark-blue range. The Excel sheet uses a plug-in that shuffles contents of a range. I was surprised to see a 15 (on the Forest Gnome Wizard) as a hypergeometric distribution made that look like a 1-2% chance. I've probably made some errors... the fidelity is good-enough for my purposes! One thing I felt particularly satisfied with is that with luck and focus a character could work towards a 20 stat... but they would have to make trade-offs to get it and I think it would feel genuinely exceptional. I also much prefer where the base range (6-15) falls against MM creatures (e.g. Giant strength scores!) [/QUOTE]

Verification