Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How do you handle Mordenkainen's Disjunction?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WingOver" data-source="post: 1129243" data-attributes="member: 13911"><p>I don't ever want to use Disjunction if I can help it. I agree 100% that it's messy and may potentially destroy magic items. But vs. another wizard, a disjunction response is necessary for survival. If I find myself suddenly left defenseless from his disjoin, I have no choice but to hit him back, the heck with potential lost loot (hopefully he doesn't have an artifact on him). I'd rather be poor than dead. Besides, a wizard has the best chance of saving against it anyway, effectively turning it into an unresistable dispel magic.</p><p></p><p>Anti-magic Field is a deathwish for wizards (unless you're talking about a private duel). I'd rather use Shapechange, turn into a beholder, and nail him with the anti-magic cone.</p><p></p><p>I want to emphasize that I don't consider Disjunction an attack option. I consider it an assured response, a deterrent that will give pause to any enemy who knows that he has a Disjunction coming his way if he launches first.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Interesting point about wanting your opponent to succeed their save. This makes wizards and clerics with the high Will saves the best targets for this spell, in that regard. However, my wizard still wouldn't risk hitting an artifact.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WingOver, post: 1129243, member: 13911"] I don't ever want to use Disjunction if I can help it. I agree 100% that it's messy and may potentially destroy magic items. But vs. another wizard, a disjunction response is necessary for survival. If I find myself suddenly left defenseless from his disjoin, I have no choice but to hit him back, the heck with potential lost loot (hopefully he doesn't have an artifact on him). I'd rather be poor than dead. Besides, a wizard has the best chance of saving against it anyway, effectively turning it into an unresistable dispel magic. Anti-magic Field is a deathwish for wizards (unless you're talking about a private duel). I'd rather use Shapechange, turn into a beholder, and nail him with the anti-magic cone. I want to emphasize that I don't consider Disjunction an attack option. I consider it an assured response, a deterrent that will give pause to any enemy who knows that he has a Disjunction coming his way if he launches first. Interesting point about wanting your opponent to succeed their save. This makes wizards and clerics with the high Will saves the best targets for this spell, in that regard. However, my wizard still wouldn't risk hitting an artifact. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How do you handle Mordenkainen's Disjunction?
Top