Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How do you hope WotC treats the upcoming classic settings?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Urriak Uruk" data-source="post: 8421491" data-attributes="member: 7015558"><p>We live in the modern world (and we always have, modern is the present). Any setting being updated will always be reflecting some modern sensibilities, otherwise it will not succeed.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>No one decides for me what is sensible. If a new Batman movie gets made where he thinks killing is ok, I think it's bad and don't watch the sequels. Enough people do that, the movies don't make money and the studio who owns Batman puts the brand on hiatus and returns to the drawing board to devise new ideas that <em>are </em>commercially successful.</p><p></p><p>The people who own D&D (WotC) decide what gets put out to the market, but we the consumers decide whether or not that successful. If enough consumers like it, they keep going down that path. If enough don't, they start over. If you're part of the minority that disagrees with the direction the commercially successful property is taking... well sorry, that's life in a capitalist society.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm surprised you didn't already know this, but WotC can't force you what to read/watch/write. You can still look at all media and pick and choose what you enjoy. A company making media you don't personally like, but that is successful because others do like it... that still doesn't force you personally to do <em>anything</em>.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I dunno, why do we get a new Pokemon game every few years when the first where probably some of the best, and the new ones are mostly derivative? Because they make money... and they make money because people buy them, and people buy them because they <em>want </em>them. And those games are going to release with a more diverse set of characters because the consumers themselves are more diverse, and more vocal about how diversity matters to them.</p><p></p><p>Again, this is how capitalism works.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Updating a new version of a property doesn't "ruin" the original. I mentioned Batman before... I don't like Batman v. Superman. I think it's an awful movie. Does it make the Dark Knight worse? Does it make Burton's Batman worse? Adam West's Batman less funny? No. That doesn't make any sense at all.</p><p></p><p>If Greyhawk gets released in 5e (and it already sort of has in Ghosts of Saltmarsh) it will have no impact on the original material published in previous editions. You can still pick them up and play them as you always have, WotC isn't going to kick down your door and make you play "Official 5E Grewhawk."</p><p></p><p>To conclude... I'm sorry you don't personally like the directly 5E has taken settings like Ravenloft. But the fact is, the rebooted Ravenloft has appeared commercially successful and well-reviewed, so the direction they took is one the 5E audience seems to like, and one the D&D team will probably continue with other settings. If it didn't, the company would be behaving <em>illogically</em>.</p><p></p><p>If 5E Greyhawk gets released and no one likes it... congrats, you were right! But there's no guarantee that it will automatically be a failure. I think it probably would be pretty good, with a nice mix of nostalgia to OSR gaming with some tweaks here and there where appropriate. I don't believe Old-School gaming is incompatible with today's social issues (it's a goddamn game). The D&D team is made up of folks who were both raised on and have written Greyhawk material, and if they're releasing it for 5E, want to do it justice.</p><p></p><p>Rant over. Maybe we can both take some deep breaths and turn down the hyperbole?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Urriak Uruk, post: 8421491, member: 7015558"] We live in the modern world (and we always have, modern is the present). Any setting being updated will always be reflecting some modern sensibilities, otherwise it will not succeed. No one decides for me what is sensible. If a new Batman movie gets made where he thinks killing is ok, I think it's bad and don't watch the sequels. Enough people do that, the movies don't make money and the studio who owns Batman puts the brand on hiatus and returns to the drawing board to devise new ideas that [I]are [/I]commercially successful. The people who own D&D (WotC) decide what gets put out to the market, but we the consumers decide whether or not that successful. If enough consumers like it, they keep going down that path. If enough don't, they start over. If you're part of the minority that disagrees with the direction the commercially successful property is taking... well sorry, that's life in a capitalist society. I'm surprised you didn't already know this, but WotC can't force you what to read/watch/write. You can still look at all media and pick and choose what you enjoy. A company making media you don't personally like, but that is successful because others do like it... that still doesn't force you personally to do [I]anything[/I]. I dunno, why do we get a new Pokemon game every few years when the first where probably some of the best, and the new ones are mostly derivative? Because they make money... and they make money because people buy them, and people buy them because they [I]want [/I]them. And those games are going to release with a more diverse set of characters because the consumers themselves are more diverse, and more vocal about how diversity matters to them. Again, this is how capitalism works. Updating a new version of a property doesn't "ruin" the original. I mentioned Batman before... I don't like Batman v. Superman. I think it's an awful movie. Does it make the Dark Knight worse? Does it make Burton's Batman worse? Adam West's Batman less funny? No. That doesn't make any sense at all. If Greyhawk gets released in 5e (and it already sort of has in Ghosts of Saltmarsh) it will have no impact on the original material published in previous editions. You can still pick them up and play them as you always have, WotC isn't going to kick down your door and make you play "Official 5E Grewhawk." To conclude... I'm sorry you don't personally like the directly 5E has taken settings like Ravenloft. But the fact is, the rebooted Ravenloft has appeared commercially successful and well-reviewed, so the direction they took is one the 5E audience seems to like, and one the D&D team will probably continue with other settings. If it didn't, the company would be behaving [I]illogically[/I]. If 5E Greyhawk gets released and no one likes it... congrats, you were right! But there's no guarantee that it will automatically be a failure. I think it probably would be pretty good, with a nice mix of nostalgia to OSR gaming with some tweaks here and there where appropriate. I don't believe Old-School gaming is incompatible with today's social issues (it's a goddamn game). The D&D team is made up of folks who were both raised on and have written Greyhawk material, and if they're releasing it for 5E, want to do it justice. Rant over. Maybe we can both take some deep breaths and turn down the hyperbole? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How do you hope WotC treats the upcoming classic settings?
Top