Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How do you like your ASIs?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vince_Snetterton" data-source="post: 8456645" data-attributes="member: 7033114"><p>I was pointing out the silliness of the debate.</p><p>The natural extension of this debate is that limitations based on size be done away with next. And that is simply the wrong direction for the game to take. </p><p></p><p>Yes, we should be doubling down on species based differences. Under no circumstances should a 3'3 " 40 pound Halfling, even one that spent their lives dedicated to martial fighting, even at level 19, have the ability to dead lift as much 250 pound 6'6" Half-Orc, even one that has dedicated its life to the arcane arts. Even though this is a game with magic everywhere, there are basic bio-mechanical laws that simply can't be broken. So until WOTC releases some kind of "relative strength" modifiers (which they won't, because that is "hard" and "boring and no fun"), we are stuck with the abstractions we have today, and that means hard limits on species. You do note that the game already acknowledges the variations in species by simply height and weight, which tracks pretty closely to real world human differences. So other limitations are perfectly reasonable.</p><p></p><p>You want to have a debate about Int, or Wis, or CHA...yeah, these are attributes that I can concede may not have limitations across the species. But the physical ones...nope. There has to be some "reality" in the game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vince_Snetterton, post: 8456645, member: 7033114"] I was pointing out the silliness of the debate. The natural extension of this debate is that limitations based on size be done away with next. And that is simply the wrong direction for the game to take. Yes, we should be doubling down on species based differences. Under no circumstances should a 3'3 " 40 pound Halfling, even one that spent their lives dedicated to martial fighting, even at level 19, have the ability to dead lift as much 250 pound 6'6" Half-Orc, even one that has dedicated its life to the arcane arts. Even though this is a game with magic everywhere, there are basic bio-mechanical laws that simply can't be broken. So until WOTC releases some kind of "relative strength" modifiers (which they won't, because that is "hard" and "boring and no fun"), we are stuck with the abstractions we have today, and that means hard limits on species. You do note that the game already acknowledges the variations in species by simply height and weight, which tracks pretty closely to real world human differences. So other limitations are perfectly reasonable. You want to have a debate about Int, or Wis, or CHA...yeah, these are attributes that I can concede may not have limitations across the species. But the physical ones...nope. There has to be some "reality" in the game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How do you like your ASIs?
Top