Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How is the rogue nerfed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 6054039" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>Unclear phrasing. Fascinate as a condition is easy to break. Any hostile action will do it. Drawing a weapon, for example. Sure, it was highly likely to take effect if you tried it - but its power was limited by the fact its usefulness was very situational so was a niche ability. Now it's extremely situational and not terribly likely to work compared to any of the actually effective enchantments. Also it's taken a massive time nerf - down from the duration of the bard's performance to 1 round/level.</p><p></p><p>Which meant it used to be a nice tool for complex plans, with the ease of numerical success offset by the difficulty of getting it into a situation where it could work. You drop the bard off in the guard's barracks as part of an assassination to keep the reinforcements busy. Now a 20th level bard can only hold the barracks with fascinate for about three minutes and the save DC isn't that high so you can't have a bard holding a room at sane levels. This means there is no point using fascinate to enable plans, making it pure weak sauce.</p><p></p><p>Yes, the scaling was wrong. But to be useful for the sort of thing it should be, Fascinate needed to be really difficult to resist as the effect was so weak. If Pathfinder had actually bothered to understand the Bard and e.g. made Fascinate into a 15+(level/2)+Cha DC and instituted a rule saying "Every five rounds of fascinate takes one round of bardic performance" to enable minutes rather than seconds it would work properly.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>At low levels on the flanks in melee can often be the safest place to be except behind a solid wall. Goblins and Kobolds can focus fire on anyone not in melee. And calling a bard super-squishy is pushing it, especially in PF. Light armour is good and you can't afford something better than scale (which PF fortunately bumped by a point - it needed it) at 1st level.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure. It just really isn't any different than throw something and move first round overall.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 6054039, member: 87792"] Unclear phrasing. Fascinate as a condition is easy to break. Any hostile action will do it. Drawing a weapon, for example. Sure, it was highly likely to take effect if you tried it - but its power was limited by the fact its usefulness was very situational so was a niche ability. Now it's extremely situational and not terribly likely to work compared to any of the actually effective enchantments. Also it's taken a massive time nerf - down from the duration of the bard's performance to 1 round/level. Which meant it used to be a nice tool for complex plans, with the ease of numerical success offset by the difficulty of getting it into a situation where it could work. You drop the bard off in the guard's barracks as part of an assassination to keep the reinforcements busy. Now a 20th level bard can only hold the barracks with fascinate for about three minutes and the save DC isn't that high so you can't have a bard holding a room at sane levels. This means there is no point using fascinate to enable plans, making it pure weak sauce. Yes, the scaling was wrong. But to be useful for the sort of thing it should be, Fascinate needed to be really difficult to resist as the effect was so weak. If Pathfinder had actually bothered to understand the Bard and e.g. made Fascinate into a 15+(level/2)+Cha DC and instituted a rule saying "Every five rounds of fascinate takes one round of bardic performance" to enable minutes rather than seconds it would work properly. At low levels on the flanks in melee can often be the safest place to be except behind a solid wall. Goblins and Kobolds can focus fire on anyone not in melee. And calling a bard super-squishy is pushing it, especially in PF. Light armour is good and you can't afford something better than scale (which PF fortunately bumped by a point - it needed it) at 1st level. Sure. It just really isn't any different than throw something and move first round overall. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How is the rogue nerfed
Top