Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How is the Wizard vs Warrior Balance Problem Handled in Fantasy Literature?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 5496920" data-attributes="member: 18280"><p>Note the first quote. It doesn't say, "In no film does Bond fail his primary mission". It says, "James Bond does not end his movies with "And then the villains won, <strong>THE END</strong>".</p><p></p><p>In OHMSS, Bond beats the villians repeatedly. He prevents Blofeld's main scheme. And then the villians won, <strong>THE END</strong>. That's the film. </p><p></p><p>Losing at X doesn't somehow negate winning at Y. Losing at X or Y doesn't negate winning at Z.</p><p></p><p>Now, let us cast our eyes on <em><strong>Casino Royale</strong></em>, which is an interesting counter-point to OHMSS. In CR, Bond does fail in both his primary mission, and in his primary desire. BUT the film ends with "And then James Bond won, <strong>THE END</strong>. And it is a very similar "Then X won" in both of the given films. Both X's have had something precious taken away from them, but were able to get a modicum of revenge.</p><p></p><p>But, IF one is to say that the ending of OHMSS doesn't count as a win for Blofeld, THEN it is unfair to say that the ending of CR is a win for Bond. Because these films parallel each other in this way, it is impossible to say (with a straight face, anyway) that both end with Bond winning.</p><p></p><p>Either way, there is a clear indication that Bond can, and does, lose.</p><p></p><p></p><p>RC</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 5496920, member: 18280"] Note the first quote. It doesn't say, "In no film does Bond fail his primary mission". It says, "James Bond does not end his movies with "And then the villains won, [B]THE END[/B]". In OHMSS, Bond beats the villians repeatedly. He prevents Blofeld's main scheme. And then the villians won, [b]THE END[/b]. That's the film. Losing at X doesn't somehow negate winning at Y. Losing at X or Y doesn't negate winning at Z. Now, let us cast our eyes on [I][B]Casino Royale[/B][/I], which is an interesting counter-point to OHMSS. In CR, Bond does fail in both his primary mission, and in his primary desire. BUT the film ends with "And then James Bond won, [B]THE END[/B]. And it is a very similar "Then X won" in both of the given films. Both X's have had something precious taken away from them, but were able to get a modicum of revenge. But, IF one is to say that the ending of OHMSS doesn't count as a win for Blofeld, THEN it is unfair to say that the ending of CR is a win for Bond. Because these films parallel each other in this way, it is impossible to say (with a straight face, anyway) that both end with Bond winning. Either way, there is a clear indication that Bond can, and does, lose. RC [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How is the Wizard vs Warrior Balance Problem Handled in Fantasy Literature?
Top