Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How is the Wizard vs Warrior Balance Problem Handled in Fantasy Literature?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 5501206" data-attributes="member: 18280"><p>I think it's pretty simple to keep up. A claim was made that a Ftr 1 could be a regular guy just off the turnip wagon, and a counter-claim was made that it could not be so, in any edition.</p><p></p><p>Everything else is an exploration of that counter-claim.</p><p></p><p>I think, personally, that, because characters start more powerful in 4e than in earlier editions, it was taken as some form of dire insult to suggest (or admit) that some editions might do "turnip-farmer-turned-PC" better (where better is defined only as statistically closer to a turnip farmer).</p><p></p><p>At this point, rather than say, "Yeah, X is focused on Y, whereas Z was focused on B", all rationality went out the window, and we had more than one claim that a Ftr 1 <em><strong>must be</strong></em> superhuman (or words to that effect).</p><p></p><p>And, AFAICT, that <strong><em>must be</em></strong> is the only point of contention.</p><p></p><p>Therefore, you have people putting forth various counter-examples, and putting forth a counter-example (even if it differs from other counter-examples) isn't shifting the goalposts.</p><p></p><p>And you have various other people simply ignoring whatever counter-example doesn't fit the framework that <strong><em>must be</em></strong>.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nah.</p><p></p><p>I have no expectation of how things should look. In most games that I play, PCs are exceptional simply by being PCs. In RCFG, I even came up with a term to describe this: "Champion Class Creature". </p><p></p><p>But I know that things do not <em><strong>have to be this way</strong></em>. And even the Champion Class Creature nomenclature wouldn't prevent a GM from framing a game in RCFG where the PCs were ex-farmers with mundane abilities just off the turnip truck. </p><p></p><p>Heck, as many have pointed out on EN World in the past, even abilities that seem clearly supernatural to me (either in their execution or implications, such as Come and Get It) don't require that the people playing the game think of their characters as superhuman. They are quite capable of making what might seem a supernatural ability instead conform to the fantasy reality of the campaign setting.</p><p></p><p>What you <strong><em>prefer</em></strong> should have nothing to do with what you concede to be <em><strong>possible</strong></em>.</p><p></p><p></p><p>RC</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 5501206, member: 18280"] I think it's pretty simple to keep up. A claim was made that a Ftr 1 could be a regular guy just off the turnip wagon, and a counter-claim was made that it could not be so, in any edition. Everything else is an exploration of that counter-claim. I think, personally, that, because characters start more powerful in 4e than in earlier editions, it was taken as some form of dire insult to suggest (or admit) that some editions might do "turnip-farmer-turned-PC" better (where better is defined only as statistically closer to a turnip farmer). At this point, rather than say, "Yeah, X is focused on Y, whereas Z was focused on B", all rationality went out the window, and we had more than one claim that a Ftr 1 [I][B]must be[/B][/I] superhuman (or words to that effect). And, AFAICT, that [B][I]must be[/I][/B] is the only point of contention. Therefore, you have people putting forth various counter-examples, and putting forth a counter-example (even if it differs from other counter-examples) isn't shifting the goalposts. And you have various other people simply ignoring whatever counter-example doesn't fit the framework that [B][I]must be[/I][/B]. Nah. I have no expectation of how things should look. In most games that I play, PCs are exceptional simply by being PCs. In RCFG, I even came up with a term to describe this: "Champion Class Creature". But I know that things do not [I][B]have to be this way[/B][/I]. And even the Champion Class Creature nomenclature wouldn't prevent a GM from framing a game in RCFG where the PCs were ex-farmers with mundane abilities just off the turnip truck. Heck, as many have pointed out on EN World in the past, even abilities that seem clearly supernatural to me (either in their execution or implications, such as Come and Get It) don't require that the people playing the game think of their characters as superhuman. They are quite capable of making what might seem a supernatural ability instead conform to the fantasy reality of the campaign setting. What you [B][I]prefer[/I][/B] should have nothing to do with what you concede to be [I][B]possible[/B][/I]. RC [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How is the Wizard vs Warrior Balance Problem Handled in Fantasy Literature?
Top