Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How is the Wizard vs Warrior Balance Problem Handled in Fantasy Literature?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Herremann the Wise" data-source="post: 5513794" data-attributes="member: 11300"><p>A question then: how would you design "backlash rules" that were more enjoyable for all concerned? What regular and mild backlash effects would you think reasonable (on let's say a 30% - 6 or below on a d20 - chance of miscasting and suffering)?</p><p></p><p>I think your fighter coin-tossing question a good one but there is a very important dynamic there that I think would be interesting to vary and ponder. If it is a coin toss, then the player is still thinking in their mind that they have an average chance of success. In other words, they have a reasonable incentive to give it a go if the chips are down (and thus 50% of the time that they are encouraged by the situation to give it a go, they lose their character).</p><p></p><p>However, what if you reduced the chance of success quite dramatically to let's say 10% (19+ on a d20)? And then you reduced the chance of death down a little but so it was still significant at let's say 25% (5 or below on a d20)***. In between these you might have one of the mild backlash effects such as needing a round to gather back the power to cast or perhaps more severely fatiguing the caster for the encounter. In other words, you are reducing the incentive to cast the spell based upon chance of success. Reducing the incentive means that the overall chance of losing the character is significantly reduced (to perhaps an acceptable level play-wise) but in the mind of the player and his or her caster the danger of the situation is still very much there and this spell will thus be used very much as a last resort. It becomes the classic piece of dark and mysterious arcane knowledge that an upstanding wizard would never trifle with, but the more curious wizard might weaken and study and eventually cast like a moth to a flame. The decision to cast such a spell would be a very interesting piece of role-playing I think within that context.</p><p></p><p>Just a thought.</p><p></p><p>I would very much appreciate your thoughts though on a workable backlash mechanic even if it is to repeat that it could not work effectively. You seem to have a very astute eye for such things.</p><p></p><p>Best Regards</p><p>Herremann the Wise</p><p></p><p>*** I think this Double DC mechanic would be an interesting step in a more advanced form of D&D opening up a vast array of interesting options. I've been wanting to start a thread on it but the full concept is still incomplete. I have been working away at it here and there to make a more interesting and complete presentation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Herremann the Wise, post: 5513794, member: 11300"] A question then: how would you design "backlash rules" that were more enjoyable for all concerned? What regular and mild backlash effects would you think reasonable (on let's say a 30% - 6 or below on a d20 - chance of miscasting and suffering)? I think your fighter coin-tossing question a good one but there is a very important dynamic there that I think would be interesting to vary and ponder. If it is a coin toss, then the player is still thinking in their mind that they have an average chance of success. In other words, they have a reasonable incentive to give it a go if the chips are down (and thus 50% of the time that they are encouraged by the situation to give it a go, they lose their character). However, what if you reduced the chance of success quite dramatically to let's say 10% (19+ on a d20)? And then you reduced the chance of death down a little but so it was still significant at let's say 25% (5 or below on a d20)***. In between these you might have one of the mild backlash effects such as needing a round to gather back the power to cast or perhaps more severely fatiguing the caster for the encounter. In other words, you are reducing the incentive to cast the spell based upon chance of success. Reducing the incentive means that the overall chance of losing the character is significantly reduced (to perhaps an acceptable level play-wise) but in the mind of the player and his or her caster the danger of the situation is still very much there and this spell will thus be used very much as a last resort. It becomes the classic piece of dark and mysterious arcane knowledge that an upstanding wizard would never trifle with, but the more curious wizard might weaken and study and eventually cast like a moth to a flame. The decision to cast such a spell would be a very interesting piece of role-playing I think within that context. Just a thought. I would very much appreciate your thoughts though on a workable backlash mechanic even if it is to repeat that it could not work effectively. You seem to have a very astute eye for such things. Best Regards Herremann the Wise *** I think this Double DC mechanic would be an interesting step in a more advanced form of D&D opening up a vast array of interesting options. I've been wanting to start a thread on it but the full concept is still incomplete. I have been working away at it here and there to make a more interesting and complete presentation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How is the Wizard vs Warrior Balance Problem Handled in Fantasy Literature?
Top