Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How is the Wizard vs Warrior Balance Problem Handled in Fantasy Literature?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Neonchameleon" data-source="post: 5520996" data-attributes="member: 87792"><p>No. Which is why the best thing about the 3.X bard was Perform (Oratory). If your bard is either singing or playing a lute in 3.X that is a personal choice, and there is nothing preventing bards from being tone deaf and just very good at speaking. And just because you stereotype otherwise doesn't make it so.</p><p></p><p>Gandalf and Merlin were primarily known for <em>knowledge</em>. Not for flashy magic, but for knowing things. Bards have Bardic Lore, Wizards do not. Also bards have a <em>lot</em> of skill points. Then they were both tricksters. I don't know if Gandalf used fascinate or just a simple bluff in The Hobbit to deal with the trolls. I do know it wasn't presented as spellcasting, but the bard abilities suit it perfectly. Bardic knowledge, and the charisma and trickery heavy bardic skill list suit both characters perfectly. The wizard fails here. But Fascinate, Inspire Competence, Suggestion, and even Inspire Courage/Greatness are all close matches for what they actually do. (With the reverberating duration of Inspire Courage, just naming a weakness is sufficient to grant it for the rest of the fight).</p><p></p><p>Then we look at their spells. Neither cast very many (indeed it's debatable that without his Ring even Gandalf could cast too many). And when they do, what is it? Some fire from Gandalf, but normally illusion, divination, or enchantment. In other words the sort of spells that are on the Bard list rather than flashy spells like Wall of Stone, Black Tentacles, and Overland Flight (the latter of which would have made Lord of the Rings very different). Also neither of them is ever mentioned to be Vancian. So I find bardic casting a much better representation of both Gandalf and Merlin than wizardly casting.</p><p> </p><p>More accurate skills, more accurate magic, knowledge that actually works. In just about every way I can think of both Merlin and Gandalf are 3.X Bards whereas the D&D wizard is mostly a D&D wizard.</p><p> </p><p>While on the subject, some of the myths, Merlin was quite literally a bard.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Neonchameleon, post: 5520996, member: 87792"] No. Which is why the best thing about the 3.X bard was Perform (Oratory). If your bard is either singing or playing a lute in 3.X that is a personal choice, and there is nothing preventing bards from being tone deaf and just very good at speaking. And just because you stereotype otherwise doesn't make it so. Gandalf and Merlin were primarily known for [I]knowledge[/I]. Not for flashy magic, but for knowing things. Bards have Bardic Lore, Wizards do not. Also bards have a [I]lot[/I] of skill points. Then they were both tricksters. I don't know if Gandalf used fascinate or just a simple bluff in The Hobbit to deal with the trolls. I do know it wasn't presented as spellcasting, but the bard abilities suit it perfectly. Bardic knowledge, and the charisma and trickery heavy bardic skill list suit both characters perfectly. The wizard fails here. But Fascinate, Inspire Competence, Suggestion, and even Inspire Courage/Greatness are all close matches for what they actually do. (With the reverberating duration of Inspire Courage, just naming a weakness is sufficient to grant it for the rest of the fight). Then we look at their spells. Neither cast very many (indeed it's debatable that without his Ring even Gandalf could cast too many). And when they do, what is it? Some fire from Gandalf, but normally illusion, divination, or enchantment. In other words the sort of spells that are on the Bard list rather than flashy spells like Wall of Stone, Black Tentacles, and Overland Flight (the latter of which would have made Lord of the Rings very different). Also neither of them is ever mentioned to be Vancian. So I find bardic casting a much better representation of both Gandalf and Merlin than wizardly casting. More accurate skills, more accurate magic, knowledge that actually works. In just about every way I can think of both Merlin and Gandalf are 3.X Bards whereas the D&D wizard is mostly a D&D wizard. While on the subject, some of the myths, Merlin was quite literally a bard. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
How is the Wizard vs Warrior Balance Problem Handled in Fantasy Literature?
Top