Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
How long do we wait for WoTC to speak?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bedrockgames" data-source="post: 8891671" data-attributes="member: 85555"><p>Definitely I think that could use better context but the comment itself appears in a weird context in the document. I'm frankly a little confused by its placement. It appears twice in the document that I can see, and in both cases it isn't in a section devoted to the issue of hateful content, but the two general termination sections (VIII and X, I believe). Maybe part of the confusion here is this is a comment in the section itself and I think a lot of people are confused by what these comments are exactly. The full text of the comment definitely leads with discussion of racism, sexism, homophobia, etc. But it also does seem to get into other issues like that people waive their right to sue over termination: </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But the section they are commenting on is this: </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Like I said, I am totally open to journalists being criticized. They get things wrong at times and that needs to be corrected when it happens. I don't know that I would attribute sinister motives to this, as I am not fully sure I understand the context or full implications even after looking it up and reading it again myself. </p><p></p><p>Again, I do find these comments rather confusing since I don't know why they are in the document. So I am open to understanding more. But I also feel like this reads as if they are front loading the issues of racism, in order to make it sound like all of the other stuff in the termination clauses are part of some kind of morality clause (when it looks like their main concern is IP protection). Would definitely like to see others weigh in on this</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bedrockgames, post: 8891671, member: 85555"] Definitely I think that could use better context but the comment itself appears in a weird context in the document. I'm frankly a little confused by its placement. It appears twice in the document that I can see, and in both cases it isn't in a section devoted to the issue of hateful content, but the two general termination sections (VIII and X, I believe). Maybe part of the confusion here is this is a comment in the section itself and I think a lot of people are confused by what these comments are exactly. The full text of the comment definitely leads with discussion of racism, sexism, homophobia, etc. But it also does seem to get into other issues like that people waive their right to sue over termination: But the section they are commenting on is this: Like I said, I am totally open to journalists being criticized. They get things wrong at times and that needs to be corrected when it happens. I don't know that I would attribute sinister motives to this, as I am not fully sure I understand the context or full implications even after looking it up and reading it again myself. Again, I do find these comments rather confusing since I don't know why they are in the document. So I am open to understanding more. But I also feel like this reads as if they are front loading the issues of racism, in order to make it sound like all of the other stuff in the termination clauses are part of some kind of morality clause (when it looks like their main concern is IP protection). Would definitely like to see others weigh in on this [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
Publishing Business & Licensing
How long do we wait for WoTC to speak?
Top