Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="mamba" data-source="post: 9128851" data-attributes="member: 7034611">it only is a problem if the expectation does not match realityI would hope so too, but they keep asking us whether we like things <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />At a minimum I see no cohesive vision, or even a desire to actually improve anything. I only see a desire to get a high approval rating, no matter what. Offer one thing and its diametrical opposite, then run with whichever was more popular, consequences be damnedno, it just means that WotC failed at improving it, not that it cannot be improved uponThe final jury on that is still out to me, but right now the bigger font and new art seem to be the clear improvements, everything else is more treading water to me. Some things are slightly better, some are slightly worse, which in summary makes this a huge disappointment</blockquote>

[QUOTE="mamba, post: 9128851, member: 7034611"] it only is a problem if the expectation does not match reality I would hope so too, but they keep asking us whether we like things ;) At a minimum I see no cohesive vision, or even a desire to actually improve anything. I only see a desire to get a high approval rating, no matter what. Offer one thing and its diametrical opposite, then run with whichever was more popular, consequences be damned no, it just means that WotC failed at improving it, not that it cannot be improved upon The final jury on that is still out to me, but right now the bigger font and new art seem to be the clear improvements, everything else is more treading water to me. Some things are slightly better, some are slightly worse, which in summary makes this a huge disappointment [/QUOTE]

Verification