Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="UngeheuerLich" data-source="post: 9465102" data-attributes="member: 59057">It is. Maybe not in yours. You are a math genius. Which is only true of you focus fire mooks. Not every fight is a 4 beat one after the other. Maybe in your games. Not a generally valid assumption. Still maybe not a bad idea. Good that a two weapon build can get away not using bonus actions. Yeah. Because in 2014, you did not use your bonus action for twf a lot... I think your assumptions are bad. Maybe good for your game, but not as a general assumption.Many games have fights against one big monster with some minions. Let the wizard blow the minions to shreds or use hunter's mark on the main target and follow up with conjure barrage to clear the room from minions. If you can afford always going 4 vs 1 while neglecting the other monsters, what are the other 3 doing? Standing around doing nothing? I guess they are also going 4 vs 1 on a single player...</blockquote>

[QUOTE="UngeheuerLich, post: 9465102, member: 59057"] It is. Maybe not in yours. You are a math genius. Which is only true of you focus fire mooks. Not every fight is a 4 beat one after the other. Maybe in your games. Not a generally valid assumption. Still maybe not a bad idea. Good that a two weapon build can get away not using bonus actions. Yeah. Because in 2014, you did not use your bonus action for twf a lot... I think your assumptions are bad. Maybe good for your game, but not as a general assumption. Many games have fights against one big monster with some minions. Let the wizard blow the minions to shreds or use hunter's mark on the main target and follow up with conjure barrage to clear the room from minions. If you can afford always going 4 vs 1 while neglecting the other monsters, what are the other 3 doing? Standing around doing nothing? I guess they are also going 4 vs 1 on a single player... [/QUOTE]

Verification