Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="UngeheuerLich" data-source="post: 9467225" data-attributes="member: 59057">Maybe. But his games are also higher tactical optimization than ours. Never said it is not simple. Just the assumption that enemies take a few rounds to kill. Yes. But TWF does not necessarily. Yeah. So you did not claim that favoured foe is better. Try read the whole communication again. They don't have to get consitent damage. Only more than from favoured foe. And if you are switching targets a lot. Use a different spell. Data please. You are convenently overlooking that I have more than one game as do you. So your limited view is better than mine? That is some kind of bias. Roll 20 has self selecting bias. As it is a virtual battlemap, you will find more players thatvare tactically adept. Not a lot. As do you. I am extrapolating from my games as you do. Again.I said that I expect 2024 favoured enemy hunter's mark to outpace favoured foe easily in games, because favoured foe just does less in most cases. And the cases where it is better, favoured foe or enemy is not needed at all. Two of them are bad analysts. On treantmonk is credible. And he is totally fine with a ranger that has hunter's mark. At least until now. So please. Get your facts straight. Get your math straight. Learn how to actually do analyses and then com back.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="UngeheuerLich, post: 9467225, member: 59057"] Maybe. But his games are also higher tactical optimization than ours. Never said it is not simple. Just the assumption that enemies take a few rounds to kill. [I]Yes. But TWF does not necessarily. [/I] Yeah. So you did not claim that favoured foe is better. Try read the whole communication again. They don't have to get consitent damage. Only more than from favoured foe. And if you are switching targets a lot. Use a different spell. Data please. You are convenently overlooking that I have more than one game as do you. So your limited view is better than mine? That is some kind of bias. Roll 20 has self selecting bias. As it is a virtual battlemap, you will find more players thatvare tactically adept. Not a lot. As do you. I am extrapolating from my games as you do. Again. I said that I expect 2024 favoured enemy hunter's mark to outpace favoured foe easily in games, because favoured foe just does less in most cases. And the cases where it is better, favoured foe or enemy is not needed at all. Two of them are bad analysts. On treantmonk is credible. And he is totally fine with a ranger that has hunter's mark. At least until now. So please. Get your facts straight. Get your math straight. Learn how to actually do analyses and then com back. [/QUOTE]

Verification