Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="UngeheuerLich" data-source="post: 9468108" data-attributes="member: 59057">The whole discussion started with someone claiming favoured foe is better. Because they can use up all uses in a single turn.I said, if that is all you get out of it, it was no needed to begin with.I said, that in difficult encounters, hunter's mark sticks a bit longer.Except when everyone focus fires.In 2014 focus fire was easier, because ranged did more damage. In melee it is harder.Also, with TWF and nick, hunter's mark pays dividents faster than without it. For low level play, twice as fast. So even if you need to switch it every other turn, you already got 4d6 damage out of it. Which is nice for a resource free bonus action. And even if you just drop it, youbare doing ok. I have my own experience of playing 5e for 10 years with many different people.Bollocks. You are still not seeing the whole thing. But you do you.Which stays irrelevant. As your games are obviously highly tactical optimized.Ok. That was the context from my first post you reacted to.I am done. All Infos are laid out already.Bye.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="UngeheuerLich, post: 9468108, member: 59057"] The whole discussion started with someone claiming favoured foe is better. Because they can use up all uses in a single turn. I said, if that is all you get out of it, it was no needed to begin with. I said, that in difficult encounters, hunter's mark sticks a bit longer. Except when everyone focus fires. In 2014 focus fire was easier, because ranged did more damage. In melee it is harder. Also, with TWF and nick, hunter's mark pays dividents faster than without it. For low level play, twice as fast. So even if you need to switch it every other turn, you already got 4d6 damage out of it. Which is nice for a resource free bonus action. And even if you just drop it, youbare doing ok. I have my own experience of playing 5e for 10 years with many different people. Bollocks. You are still not seeing the whole thing. But you do you. Which stays irrelevant. As your games are obviously highly tactical optimized. Ok. That was the context from my first post you reacted to. I am done. All Infos are laid out already. Bye. [/QUOTE]

Verification