Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How We Beat the HD, HotDQ, Spoilers
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KarinsDad" data-source="post: 6403106" data-attributes="member: 2011"><p>That was the first official encounter for 5E. Using foes that have an ability to shoot, move, and hide, and then shoot again possibly with advantage the next round is not the way to introduce brand new players to the game. Sure, the module stated that two of the kobolds should just walk right out and fight, and possibly many DMs did that (possibly not). But that encounter, if run according to the rules and the abilities of the NPCs, could really be pretty kick butt. PCs could die right away.</p><p></p><p>You are entitled to your opinion that people should just be thrown into the deep end of the lake and either swim or sink, but I don't view it that way. Sure, encounter 3 or 4, start throwing in tougher and tougher challenges. I suspect that the first encounter was pretty easy for some groups, pretty hard for others, and downright deadly for some groups.</p><p></p><p>Fortunately, LMoP comes with pregenerated PCs. If the players had had to create their own PCs the first time ever playing the game and those PCs died in round 2 or 3, yeah, I could see where someone would think that D&D totally sucks.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I would prefer that the first experience that someone has with the game system be awesome, not that it sucks. You are entitled to your opinion that them getting annoyed and never playing the game again is good for our D&D gaming community. I suspect that most of our fellow gamers would not agree with you on that point.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Actually, the issue came up more when the first person to reply on this thread told me how honorable that NPC would have been. Late at night after finding out how many hit points that guy had? Yeah, that's probably what got me irritated in the first place.</p><p></p><p>It then occurred to me that the first two modules had two dragons that the PCs were supposed to attack and a half dragon that one PC was supposed to take a dirt nap over.</p><p></p><p>This is not a playstyle I enjoy. Let's see how big and bad the designers can make the monsters, just to prove to the players that their PC sucks. Sorry, I enjoy playing the hero, not the zero.</p><p></p><p>I'm glad that people like playing encounters where their PC sucks and has a good chance of going unconscious or dying. I don't particularly enjoy that. I think it's unnecessary. A risk of death, fine. A real challenging encounter, great. A fake risk of death (i.e the NPC is not REALLY going to kill you) under the fake guise of an extremely high chance of death, lame. Very lame. That's not threatening. That's just annoying. That's just the DM (or designers in this case) saying "Today, you are going to take a dirt nap, just because I can do that to you.". Meh. If the adventure designer kicking your PC into the dirt is fun for you, please enjoy your game.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Nothing wrong with defeat or surrender once in a blue moon. Nothing wrong with difficult encounters. But humiliation in a game is something that I think belongs in the waste basket of game design. Trying to shame a PC into a no win situation is just plain lame. Obviously, YMMV.</p><p></p><p></p><p>As a side note, there is this tendency of adventurer designers to write "This NPC will do this when the PCs arrive.". In some games, that course of action makes sense for the NPC. In other games, that course of action is totally illogical. An experience DM will be able to read that and go, "Yeah, I could see where he would sometimes do that, but there are 3 guys in chainmail in our campaign, so it's probably a stupid move on his part. I'll have him do this instead.".</p><p></p><p>For adventures like LMoP and HotDQ where WotC is trying to bring in new players and new DMs to the game, it's probably a good idea to have a few different options for each of the major NPCs and not be so concrete with their motivations and actions. Let the DM decide what works best. Sure, the DM already has that capability, but new DMs might not be totally aware of that. A lot of them might think that they have to run an adventure exactly as written, or they'll screw up something later on.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KarinsDad, post: 6403106, member: 2011"] That was the first official encounter for 5E. Using foes that have an ability to shoot, move, and hide, and then shoot again possibly with advantage the next round is not the way to introduce brand new players to the game. Sure, the module stated that two of the kobolds should just walk right out and fight, and possibly many DMs did that (possibly not). But that encounter, if run according to the rules and the abilities of the NPCs, could really be pretty kick butt. PCs could die right away. You are entitled to your opinion that people should just be thrown into the deep end of the lake and either swim or sink, but I don't view it that way. Sure, encounter 3 or 4, start throwing in tougher and tougher challenges. I suspect that the first encounter was pretty easy for some groups, pretty hard for others, and downright deadly for some groups. Fortunately, LMoP comes with pregenerated PCs. If the players had had to create their own PCs the first time ever playing the game and those PCs died in round 2 or 3, yeah, I could see where someone would think that D&D totally sucks. Personally, I would prefer that the first experience that someone has with the game system be awesome, not that it sucks. You are entitled to your opinion that them getting annoyed and never playing the game again is good for our D&D gaming community. I suspect that most of our fellow gamers would not agree with you on that point. Actually, the issue came up more when the first person to reply on this thread told me how honorable that NPC would have been. Late at night after finding out how many hit points that guy had? Yeah, that's probably what got me irritated in the first place. It then occurred to me that the first two modules had two dragons that the PCs were supposed to attack and a half dragon that one PC was supposed to take a dirt nap over. This is not a playstyle I enjoy. Let's see how big and bad the designers can make the monsters, just to prove to the players that their PC sucks. Sorry, I enjoy playing the hero, not the zero. I'm glad that people like playing encounters where their PC sucks and has a good chance of going unconscious or dying. I don't particularly enjoy that. I think it's unnecessary. A risk of death, fine. A real challenging encounter, great. A fake risk of death (i.e the NPC is not REALLY going to kill you) under the fake guise of an extremely high chance of death, lame. Very lame. That's not threatening. That's just annoying. That's just the DM (or designers in this case) saying "Today, you are going to take a dirt nap, just because I can do that to you.". Meh. If the adventure designer kicking your PC into the dirt is fun for you, please enjoy your game. Nothing wrong with defeat or surrender once in a blue moon. Nothing wrong with difficult encounters. But humiliation in a game is something that I think belongs in the waste basket of game design. Trying to shame a PC into a no win situation is just plain lame. Obviously, YMMV. As a side note, there is this tendency of adventurer designers to write "This NPC will do this when the PCs arrive.". In some games, that course of action makes sense for the NPC. In other games, that course of action is totally illogical. An experience DM will be able to read that and go, "Yeah, I could see where he would sometimes do that, but there are 3 guys in chainmail in our campaign, so it's probably a stupid move on his part. I'll have him do this instead.". For adventures like LMoP and HotDQ where WotC is trying to bring in new players and new DMs to the game, it's probably a good idea to have a few different options for each of the major NPCs and not be so concrete with their motivations and actions. Let the DM decide what works best. Sure, the DM already has that capability, but new DMs might not be totally aware of that. A lot of them might think that they have to run an adventure exactly as written, or they'll screw up something later on. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
How We Beat the HD, HotDQ, Spoilers
Top