Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How will superior implements work?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 4980179" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>No, because you are comparing different classes with different sets of powers. When you say "OK, wizard, you can do more damage if you have superior implement X" then that relatively devalues all the wizard's power options that don't involve doing damage. Theoretically improved weapon damage options devalue non-damaging weapon attack powers, but since these virtually don't exist its a moot point. There are a goodly number of spells OTOH which don't do damage.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There's nothing wrong with presenting different ways to up damage, but in the end how many really need to exist? Superior weapons HAD to exist because the game needs to provide mechanics for a whole range of real world weapon options which players are going to expect to be present in the game. Having a progression short sword -> long sword -> bastard sword isn't really optional. No such logic applies to implements since the designers are free to decide what does and doesn't exist in the game WRT implements. </p><p></p><p>I'm not sure I really hold with the concept that weapon users have been extra specially favored overall either. They have a bit more in the way of stacking various damage (and to some extent to-hit) bonuses, but weapon based powers ARE fundamentally more limited. Casters have AoE type effects, a lot more ability to impose conditions of various kinds, etc. I'll grant you that weaplement use has opened up a kind of a hole in the rules that casters can crawl through to get some of the best of both worlds, but at least its a very feat intensive process. I think it would be fine to throw in some feats to put regular implements on par with that and I guess we'll see if superior implements are going to do that but I don't really get why they need to be a whole new class of equipment or what that buys us. Seems to me its a whole new subsystem that has little mechanical justification and the effort and page count might be better spent on something else instead.</p><p></p><p>Anyway, we'll see what the scoop is when PHB3 comes out. I'm not anticipating anything amazing but I'll be perfectly happy if they've managed to figure out some clever new thing that really adds to the game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 4980179, member: 82106"] No, because you are comparing different classes with different sets of powers. When you say "OK, wizard, you can do more damage if you have superior implement X" then that relatively devalues all the wizard's power options that don't involve doing damage. Theoretically improved weapon damage options devalue non-damaging weapon attack powers, but since these virtually don't exist its a moot point. There are a goodly number of spells OTOH which don't do damage. There's nothing wrong with presenting different ways to up damage, but in the end how many really need to exist? Superior weapons HAD to exist because the game needs to provide mechanics for a whole range of real world weapon options which players are going to expect to be present in the game. Having a progression short sword -> long sword -> bastard sword isn't really optional. No such logic applies to implements since the designers are free to decide what does and doesn't exist in the game WRT implements. I'm not sure I really hold with the concept that weapon users have been extra specially favored overall either. They have a bit more in the way of stacking various damage (and to some extent to-hit) bonuses, but weapon based powers ARE fundamentally more limited. Casters have AoE type effects, a lot more ability to impose conditions of various kinds, etc. I'll grant you that weaplement use has opened up a kind of a hole in the rules that casters can crawl through to get some of the best of both worlds, but at least its a very feat intensive process. I think it would be fine to throw in some feats to put regular implements on par with that and I guess we'll see if superior implements are going to do that but I don't really get why they need to be a whole new class of equipment or what that buys us. Seems to me its a whole new subsystem that has little mechanical justification and the effort and page count might be better spent on something else instead. Anyway, we'll see what the scoop is when PHB3 comes out. I'm not anticipating anything amazing but I'll be perfectly happy if they've managed to figure out some clever new thing that really adds to the game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
How will superior implements work?
Top