As I'm already playing 3.75, I'm just going to hold out for 4th Ed.
dmccoy1693 said:Assuming this is representative of the total market (and obviously its not a perfect representation but it is definitely telling) any small overhead company could live very well off of 18+(unknown amount of undecided)% of the D&D market.
WayneLigon said:One thing I mentioned on the Paizo thread: do a 'Arcana Unearthed'. That, to my mind, was a '3.25'; magic system changes, spell changes, magic item changes, new classes, new feat concepts, etc. If you're going to do a "Pathfinder RPG" then make it something uniquely Pathfinder. They're already making changes to monster fluff, so why not go whole hog?
Eric Mona said:but for Paizo, "3.75" is just a code name for what we would do _after_ supporting 3.5 for a while, once you could not reliably get 3.5 rulebooks anymore. The core of our audience would have those books, so it might not be an immediate need. Eventually, we'd take the OGL version of 3.5 and update it into a new game that addresses commonly agreed upon problems, and from that point forward we'd essentially be publishing an RPG independent of Hasbro and Dungeons & Dragons.
Cadfan said:I wouldn't even look at it.
Why would I? Why in the world would a 3.75 be a better idea than just continuing to publish under 3.5?
It won't at all (i.e. none of the above in the poll - or PLANE SHIFT!). My players and I are no longer in any position to get a new game (4e, 3.75, or otherwise).dmccoy1693 said:So time to say, if this scenario does happen (even temporarily) how will this influence your spending habits?