Lord Zack said:It's the fact that it's the "realm of the dead" that I don't like.
It's a transitional realm of the dead, though. They don't stay there. After a little while, they fade away to... who knows?
Lord Zack said:It's the fact that it's the "realm of the dead" that I don't like.
Dausuul said:It's a transitional realm of the dead, though. They don't stay there. After a little while, they fade away to... who knows?
Lord Zack said:Wait a minute where does it say that?
IanB said:The answer is simple: it shouldn't.
There is no reason every campaign setting has to share or use the default cosmology. Even in 3.5, FR is different from Eberron which is different from the Great Wheel. The Planescape version of the Great Wheel absolutely must stay to maintain the integrity of the setting, IMO. It is too deep into the roots of the entire thing.
Lord Zack said:The new cosmology doesn't have the Ethereal Plane and the Plane of Shadow and has the Elemental Chaos, Feywild and Shadowfell. I don't like that.
I would like to see peoples new concepts as well as working with 4e or 2e comosologies. I think they all can work.
Kamikaze Midget said:I think it maybe works BEST if you combine them.
4e's planes alongside 2e's planes. The Feywild and the Shadowfell and the Ethereal Plane and Acheron and the Elemental Chaos and the Elemental Planes and the Abyss and....
All of them.
In fact, take the planes from Eberron, from FR, from all the other worlds.
Throw them in, too.
2e Planescape ostensibly included EVERYTHING in EVERY SETTING, EVER. I think 4e planescape, should, too. The Great Wheel was just a diagram. Sigil is still the center of it all.
I actually do quite like the new core cosmology, but I like the Great Wheel too. And whether a PS setting book needs to include the great wheel or not, it is an excellent opportunity to do so.Lord Zack said:The new cosmology doesn't have the Ethereal Plane and the Plane of Shadow and has the Elemental Chaos, Feywild and Shadowfell. I don't like that.