I can be silent no more.

Dannyalcatraz said:
You can sign up with me as soon as I invent biological breast implants...

They've tried it before actually, but they did it by taking fat from other parts of a woman's body and using it for the boob job. Unfortunately, last I remember reading about it, they had some side effects of the transplanted fat giving off false positives for tumors during mamograms, so it didn't really work.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

You can sign up with me as soon as I invent biological breast implants...

...Unfortunately, last I remember reading about it, they had some side effects of the transplanted fat giving off false positives for tumors during mamograms, so it didn't really work.

You can sign up with me as soon as I invent viable biological breast implants...
 

Shemmy said:
I find it very distressing that some people (the OMG FRankenfood!!1! types) seem to feel that the moment modern science gets involved, food stops being 'natural' and suspect some evil plot.
I couldn't not reply (don't worry I'm not looking to start a flame war).

It's not the science that I dont' trust. On teh face value of it I love Gm food and the benefits that it could give to societies accross the world and how it could benefit our entire race.

Its good science, and provided that it's properly tested and trialed (there's the first problem) then I've got no problem with it.

What I do have a problem with is the economics behind it. The large companies have effectively turned a potential famine curing tool into yet another way to bust various industries and economies through their control of growth and repoduction hormones. They bully small nations governments, they weasel their way into various government bodies (Monsanto practically owned the FDA in the late 90s early 00's).

heck when the NZ government had a select committe look at a GM labelling system Monsanto sent an entire 747 worth of employees down to give evidence.

The science of GM isn't faulty, its the system (ie rampant socially uncaring capatilism) that it's been used in that is the problem.

That's all I'm saying. Those are some good points about the allergies.

Sidekick
 



Sidekick said:
The science of GM isn't faulty, its the system (ie rampant socially uncaring capatilism) that it's been used in that is the problem. Sidekick

Well, whether the science is faulty or not is a question.

But I definitely agree with you about the system behind it as the worst part of the problem! :)
 





Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top