Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I Don't Like Damage On A Miss
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fifth Element" data-source="post: 5933351" data-attributes="member: 48135"><p>Indeed, the system is not perfect nor will it be. But the more important point, I think, is that the system is abstract.</p><p></p><p>One single feat has spawned thread after thread discussing the topic of causing damage on an apparent miss, but no one seems to be bothered that you can roll maximum damage after having *just* gotten through your opponent's defences, and you can roll minimum damage when your opponent's defences are a joke compared to your roll. Where is the believability in that?</p><p></p><p>Why are there no threads dedicated to the fact that rolling damage separately from the attack strains the believability of the game? It couldn't just be because that's how it's always been done could it?</p><p></p><p>With the Reaper feat, you have to determine the result of your "miss" before you can narrate the results of the attack. With any successful attack other than a crit, you have to determine the result of your damage roll before you narrate the result of your attack. <em>You can't jump into narrating it based only on the result of the d20 roll, because you don't actually know how powerful your blow was yet</em>.</p><p></p><p>Facing an opponent with an AC of 12, you roll a 19 on the die for a total of say 23. It seems you've completely outclassed your foe on that one. And then you roll snake eyes for damage. Oops, turns out you didn't do as well as you thought. Or you could roll an 8 on the die and just barely hit the foe (apparently), but then you roll 2 sixes for damage. Turns out what should have been a glancing blow was really a massive strike.</p><p></p><p>Similarly, you can't jump into narrating a Reaper attack based on the result of the d20 roll, because there's that damage to account for. If you say you swing over the creature's head, and yet cause damage, you'll look as silly as saying that you *just* got a glancing blow through your foe's defences, but then roll max damage and kill it in one shot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fifth Element, post: 5933351, member: 48135"] Indeed, the system is not perfect nor will it be. But the more important point, I think, is that the system is abstract. One single feat has spawned thread after thread discussing the topic of causing damage on an apparent miss, but no one seems to be bothered that you can roll maximum damage after having *just* gotten through your opponent's defences, and you can roll minimum damage when your opponent's defences are a joke compared to your roll. Where is the believability in that? Why are there no threads dedicated to the fact that rolling damage separately from the attack strains the believability of the game? It couldn't just be because that's how it's always been done could it? With the Reaper feat, you have to determine the result of your "miss" before you can narrate the results of the attack. With any successful attack other than a crit, you have to determine the result of your damage roll before you narrate the result of your attack. [I]You can't jump into narrating it based only on the result of the d20 roll, because you don't actually know how powerful your blow was yet[/I]. Facing an opponent with an AC of 12, you roll a 19 on the die for a total of say 23. It seems you've completely outclassed your foe on that one. And then you roll snake eyes for damage. Oops, turns out you didn't do as well as you thought. Or you could roll an 8 on the die and just barely hit the foe (apparently), but then you roll 2 sixes for damage. Turns out what should have been a glancing blow was really a massive strike. Similarly, you can't jump into narrating a Reaper attack based on the result of the d20 roll, because there's that damage to account for. If you say you swing over the creature's head, and yet cause damage, you'll look as silly as saying that you *just* got a glancing blow through your foe's defences, but then roll max damage and kill it in one shot. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
I Don't Like Damage On A Miss
Top