Tarrasque? Why, not a more useable monster in it's place? This is a MM2 monster at best, may use it once but just filler to me.
Last edited:
Stuffing this into Excel, it looks to me like 64 Clerics on average can take him out. Two survive on average. They get 2,422 XP each, enough to get them almost but not quite to 4th level.
Of course, to make sure, you'd want more safety factor, but on average 64 will do it.
GET OUTYou can tweet at Mike if you want. Me?
I'm afraid tarrasque him.
![]()
The only thing I miss from that illustration is a silhuette of a normal sized being so you can understand easier how much bigger the beast is compared to you. Hacklopedia and good old dinosaur books did that and it helped a lot. Otherwise I really like the picture, the stats and the breezy description. I prefer breezy descriptions over pages of insignificant information that you will never use or might be even false in your campaign.
I'm not a bird so that's not a big help. I can't relate to avian creatures. Plus are they swallows or eagles or condors?You can see some birds flying near it.
I agree. I'm also really not a fan of "Unaligned", everything's aligned. It isn't possible to be "Unaligned", that's the whole point of Neutral.
All I can say is that the mental image of the tarrasque snapping a flying wizard out of the air like a dog with a frisbee has brightened my day immeasurably.
Why would they be useless? As the poster to whom you replied noted, they would have disadvantage on attack rolls, but they do not need to make any attacks. And they cannot close to the Tarrasque, but the set-up assumes that it is closing to them, so that it can kill and/or eat them as they plink away at it with Sacred Flames.Most of those 64 clerics are going to be feared and useless.