Psionicist
Explorer
Tarrasque Wrangler said:Word. That headphone jack is crazy small.
It's not the size that matters it's how you juice it.
Tarrasque Wrangler said:Word. That headphone jack is crazy small.
GoblinMasquerade said:So, if one were going to purchase an iPod, would the Nano be the way to go?
You better hurry, because the Mini is no more. While supplies last. The Nano has replaced the Mini, which is too bad. I bought my wife the Pink Mini, and we LOVE it. It is the perfect size--not too big, not too small. Feels great in the palm of my hand. It's just a beautiful piece of technology.sniffles said:LOL!!
I hate you, Del. I am still pining for a Mini, but it's outside my budget.![]()
Also: it holds a lot less than a full-bodied, mature iPod. For $50 more than the 4 gigabyte nano, you can get a 20 gig iPod. Now, that may be more than most folks need, but 4 gigs is pretty easy to fill. Me, I like walking around with EVERYTHING.reveal said:Depends on what they want. The main difference between the main iPod and the Nano is that the Nano has a flash drive. This means it has no movable parts and, if you're a runner or walk around with your iPod, there's no chance of it skipping.
Uzumaki said:What's the point of getting a 4GB mini for $200 if it's only slighttly smaller than a 20GB iPod for $300?